Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Pawan Gupta vs Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. on 14 October, 2020

Bench: D.Y. Chandrachud, Indira Banerjee

                                                                       1

     ITEM NO.19                          Court 6 (Video Conferencing)                          SECTION XVII-A

                                         S U P R E M E C O U R T O F                I N D I A
                                                 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                                                Civil Appeal           No(s).3312/2020

     PAWAN GUPTA                                                                             Appellant(s)

                                                                      VERSUS

     EXPERION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.                                                           Respondent(s)

     (WITH I.R., IA No. 99019/2020                                     -   PERMISSION   TO   FILE   ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

     WITH
     C.A. No. 3315/2020 (XVII-A)
     (WITH IA No. 99020/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

     Date : 14-10-2020 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                                HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
                                HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE

     For Appellant(s)                            Mr. Chandrachur Bhattacharya, Adv.
                                                 Mr. Sahil Tagotra, AOR

     For Respondent(s)



                               UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                      O R D E R

1 Mr Chandrachur Bhattacharya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, urges three submissions in support of the appeals:

(i) In denying the appellant interest on delayed possession, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has relied on the judgment of Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ARJUN BISHT Date: 2020.10.14 this Court in DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt Ltd v D S Dhanda1. However, 18:20:25 IST Reason: as a matter of fact, interest was granted to the flat purchasers in that 1 Civil Appeal Nos 4910-4941 of 2019 2 case. Moreover, the decision in D S Dhanda has been construed by this Court by a subsequent decision of this Court in Wg Cdr Arifur Rahman Khan v DLF Southern Homes Pvt Ltd2;

(ii) Even as of date, neither has a registration of conveyance been made nor is possession offered to the appellants. In this context, it has been submitted that even the draft conveyance deed was shared with the appellants for the first time on 26 August 2019, over three years after the expected date of possession;

(iii) On the issue of excess area, where the finding is in favour of the appellants, the appellants would, as a matter of fact, be entitled to refund. 2 Issue notice, returnable in four weeks.

3 Dasti, in addition, is permitted.

            (SANJAY KUMAR-I)                                (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)
               AR-CUM-PS                                       COURT MASTER




2             Civil Appeal 6239 of 2019