Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Devendra Yadav @ Devendra Prasad Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 7 June, 2017

Author: Anil Kumar Upadhyay

Bench: Anil Kumar Upadhyay

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   Criminal Miscellaneous No.17057 of 2017
                       Arising Out of PS.Case No. -134 Year- 2015 Thana -LAUKHI District- MADHUBANI
                  ======================================================
                  Devendra Yadav @ Devendra Prasad Yadav, Son of Shri Bauku Yadav,
                  Resident of Village- Bishanpur, P.S.- Phulparas, District- Madhubani.
                                                                          .... .... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                  The State of Bihar.
                                                                     .... .... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s       :    Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s   : Mr. Sri Rajballabh Singh, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
                  ORAL ORDER

3    07-06-2017

In view of the statement made by the petitioner in para-13 of the petition, let a report be called from the police station concerned i.e. Laukahi Police Station in the district of Madhubani in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 134 of 2015 pending before the ACJM, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani.

The statement of the petitioner as made in para 13 is quoted below:

"That in the day of alleged occurrence the Ashyam San Kritan was going on at village Mishanpur, and the petitioner was present at the function since 31.07.2015 to 01.08.2015 at 4 P.M. hence complicity of the petitioner is falsified in the alleged occurrence."

Put up this case after receipt of the aforesaid report.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) S.Pandey/-

  U        T