Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M.Meenakshi vs B.Ramaiah on 19 October, 2016

Author: Pushpa Sathyanarayana

Bench: Pushpa Sathyanarayana

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:  19.10.2016

 C O R A M

THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

AND

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN 

C.M.A .No.3611 of 2005
and
C.M.P.No.18290 of 2005

M.Meenakshi							.. Appellant 
-Vs.-

B.Ramaiah								.. Respondent

	Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 21.06.2004 passed by the learned I Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai in FCOP No.461 of 2004. 

		For appellant 	 ...	Mr.K.Elangoo

		For respondent       ...     Mr.V.R.Shanmuganathan
J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by Pushpa Sathyanarayana,J.) When the matter is taken up today, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/ husband, by producing the copy of the order dated PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J., AND R.SUBRAMANIAN,J., 17.02.2011, passed by the learned II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai in O.P.No.173 of 2008, submitted that subsequent to the impugned judgment, the parties have been granted decree of divorce.

2. In view of the above said fact, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as nothing survives for adjudication in this appeal. However, it is open to the appellant/wife to re-open the matter, in case, the judgment passed by the learned II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai dated 17.02.2011 in O.P.No.173 of 2008 is reversed in appeal. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

							(P.S.N.J)        (R.S.M.J)
vj2							     		19.10.2016

To
1. The I Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai 
2.  The II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai.

						        	C.M.A. No.3611 of 2005