Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 14, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Hanumanthappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 February, 2025

Author: Hemant Chandangoudar

Bench: Hemant Chandangoudar

                                                     -1-
                                                               NC: 2025:KHC-D:3954
                                                          CRL.P No. 101088 of 2025
                                                      C/W CRL.P No. 101018 of 2025



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
                               DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025
                                                 BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
                                  CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101088 OF 2025
                                                  C/W
                                  CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101018 OF 2025

                      IN CRL.P. NO.101088 OF 2025:
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.   HANUMANTHAPPA S/O. VENKATESHAPPA,
                           AGE. 47 YEARS, OCC. LABOURER,
                           CURRENT R/O. 1ST WARD,
                           NEAR SUNKLAMMA TEMPLE,
                           GADIGANOORU, TQ. HOSAPETE AND
                           DIST. VIJAYANAGARA-583201,
                           PERMANENT R/O. 2ND WARD,
                           LAKSHMI BAZAR, HOSA DAROJI VILLAGE,
                           TQ. BALLARI, DSIT. BALLARI-583101.
                      2.   PARUSHURAMA S/O. MARISWAMY
                           AGE. 24 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER,
                           R/O. 15TH WARD, INDIRA NAGARA,
                           TQ. GANGAVATHI AND DIST. KOPPAL-583227.

Digitally signed by
                      3.   BHEEMESH S/O. MUDUKAPPA
R HEMALATHA                AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. LABOURER,
Location: HIGH             R/O. 21ST WARD, MURARI NAGAR,
COURT OF                   TQ. GANGAVATHI AND DIST. KOPPAL-583227.
KARNATAKA
                                                                     ...PETITIONERS
                      (BY SMT. BHAGYASHREE N.B, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:
                      THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                      REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                      HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD,
                      THROUGH HOSPET RURAL
                      POLICE STATION-583135.
                                                                ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SRI. PRAVEENA Y.DEVAREDDIYAVARA, HCGP)
                                -2-
                                           NC: 2025:KHC-D:3954
                                    CRL.P No. 101088 of 2025
                                C/W CRL.P No. 101018 of 2025



      THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. (528
OF BNSS), PRAYING TO, QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN
CONNECTION WITH C.C. NO. 1175/2022 (CRIME NO. 12/2022)
REGISTERED BY HOSAPETE RURAL POLICE STATION FOR THE
OFFENCES U/S. 3, 6(A), 7 OF ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT 1955,
U/S. 3(2)(I), 4, 6, 8 OF KARNATAKA ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES
(STORAGE ACCOUNTS MAINTENANCE VALUE NOTIFICATION)
ORDER 1981, U/S. 3, 4, 12, 18 OF KARNATAKA ESSENTIAL
COMMODITIES        (PUBLIC  DISTRIBUTION   SYSTEM)   PUBLIC
CONTROL ORDER 2016, U/S. 420 OF IPC 1860, PENDING BEFORE
THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOSAPETE, WITH
RESPECT TO PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.1, 2, AND 3.

IN CRL.P. NO.101018 OF 2025:
BETWEEN:

1.    SRIKANH S/O. HUCHAPPA
      AE. 29 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER,
      R/O. HAMPAS, TQ. H.B HALLI,
      TALUK AND DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-591222.

2.    BHAJANTRI BASAVARAJA
      AGE. 41 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESSMEN,
      R/O. HAMPASAGAR, TQ. H.B.HALLI AND
      DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-591222.

3.    KORAVARA SHIVARAJA
      AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESSMAN,
      R/O. HADAGALI, TQ. HADAGALI
      AND DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-591222.
                                                ...PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. BHAGYASHREE N.B, ADVOCATE)

AND:

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD,
THROUGH HADAGALI POLICE STATION-583201.
                                          ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PRAVEENA Y.DEVAREDDIYAVARA, HCGP)

       THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. (U/S
528    OF BNSS, 2023) SEEKING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE
                                  -3-
                                              NC: 2025:KHC-D:3954
                                      CRL.P No. 101088 of 2025
                                  C/W CRL.P No. 101018 of 2025



PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH C.C. NO.416/2022 (CRIME
NO.189/2021) REGISTERED BY HADAGALI POLICE STATION FOR
THE OFFENCES PU/S 3, 6(A), 7 OF ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT,
1955, U/S. 3, 4, 12, 18, 19 OF KARNATAKA ESSENTIAL
COMMODITIES ACT (PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM) PUBLIC
CONTROL ORDER 2016, U/S. 3(2)(i), 4, 8 OF KARNATAKA
ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES (STORAGE ACCOUNTS MAINTAINING
VALUE NOTIFICATION) ORDER, 1981 AND U/S. 420 OF IPC,
PENDING BEFORE THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HADGALI WITH
RESPECT TO PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3.

    THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

                           ORAL ORDER

1. The issues involved in these petitions are similar; therefore, they are heard together and taken up for final disposal.

2. The petitioners/accused have been charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 3, 6(A), and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Sections 4, 6, and 8 of the Karnataka Essential Commodities (Storage, Accounts, Maintaining Value Notification) Order, 1981; Sections 3, 4, 12, and 18 of the Karnataka Essential Commodities (PDS) Public Control Order, 2016; and Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution alleges that upon receiving credible information that unknown persons were transporting food grains/rice intended for distribution under the Public Distribution System, the complainant intercepted a vehicle and, upon inspection, found that the petitioners/accused were transporting rice designated for PDS distribution, allegedly for unlawful sale in the open market without authorization.

-4-

NC: 2025:KHC-D:3954 CRL.P No. 101088 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 101018 of 2025

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent/State.

5. Upon interception, the police seized the rice being transported in the vehicle. However:

• The police did not send the seized rice to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) to establish that it was intended for distribution under the Public Distribution System (PDS).
• The prosecution has not produced any material to prove that the petitioners procured the rice from an authorized fair price shop dealer for distribution to beneficiaries.
• In the absence of substantial evidence linking the seized rice to the PDS, prosecuting the petitioners under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act would amount to an abuse of the process of law.

6. Accordingly, the petitions are allowed. The impugned proceedings in CC No.1175/2022, on the file of the learned II Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Hosapete and the proceedings in CC No.416/2022 pending on the file of learned Civil Judge and JMFC, Hadagali, are hereby quashed.

Sd/-

(HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE JTR Ct:vh List No.: 1 Sl No.: 107