Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Valiya Parambil Usman vs Pengattu Rayin on 10 December, 2009

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT:

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

       MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017/24TH MAGHA, 1938

                     OP(C).No. 1277 of 2014 (O)
                     ---------------------------
                O.S. NO.363/2009 OF SUB COURT, TIRUR


PETITIONER(S):
-------------

            VALIYA PARAMBIL USMAN,
            S/O.MOIDEEN MOLLA,
            VALIYA PARAMBIL HOUSE, OZHUR (P.O.),
            TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT

            REPRESENTED BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER,
            BASHEER.K, S/O.HAMZA,
            KANNAKATH HOUSE,
            KERALADHEESWARAPURAM (P.O.),
           TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT


            BY ADV. SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

            PENGATTU RAYIN,
            S/O.MUHAMMED, PENGATTU HOUSE,
            KOLAPPURAM (P.O.),TIRUR TALUK,
            MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.


            R1  BY ADV. SMT.MEENA.A.
            R1  BY ADV. SRI.VINOD RAVINDRANATH
            R1  BY ADV. SRI.SAJU.S.A
            R1  BY ADV. SRI.K.C.KIRAN
            R1  BY ADV. SRI.M.DEVESH
            R1  BY ADV. SRI.VINAY MATHEW JOSEPH

       THIS OP (CIVIL)  HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD  ON  13-02-2017,
       THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:




EL

OP(C).No. 1277 of 2014 (O)
---------------------------

                              APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------
               EXHIBIT P1  COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS 363/2009 BEFORE
                           THE SUB COURT TIRUR DATED 10/12/2009

               EXHIBIT P2  COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY EXECUTED BY
                          THE PETITIONER DATED 1/4/2010

               EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE EA 539/10  IN EP 131/2010
                          BEFORE THE SUB COURT TIRUR DATED 18/8/2010

               EXHIBIT P4  COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT IN OS
                          363/2009 BEFORE THE SUB COURT TIRUR DATED
                          15/10/2012

               EXHIBIT P5 COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT IN OS 363/2009 BEFORE
                          THE SUB COURT TIRUR DATED 21/8/2013

               EXHIBIT P6 COPY OF THE COUNTER FILED BY THE RESPONDENT
                         IN IA 2444/2013 IN OS 363/2009 BEFORE THE
                         SUB COURT TIRUR DATED 30/8/2013

               EXHIBIT P7 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18/10/2013 IN IA
                          2444/2013 IN OS  363/2009 BEFORE THE SUB
                          COURT TIRUR

               EXHIBIT P8 COPY OF THE APPLICATION SERVING
                          INTERROGATORIES IA 3399/2013 IN OS
                          363/2009  BEFORE THE SUB COURT TIRUR DATED
                          3/12/2013

               EXHIBIT P9 COPY OF THE COUNTER FILED BY THE RESPONDENT
                          DATED 7/1/2013 IN IA 3399/2013 INOS
                          363/2009 BEFORE THE SUB COURT TIRUR

               EXHIBIT P10 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 4/2/2014 IN IA
                           3399/2013 INOS 363/2009 BEFORE THE SUB
                           COURT TIRUR

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------

           NIL

                                                TRUE COPY



                                               P.S. TO JUDGE
EL



                    A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
                 =========================
                     O.P.(C).No.1277/2014
                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Dated this the 13th day of February, 2017


                         J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.363/2009 on the file of the Sub Court, Tirur. He has approached this court aggrieved by order on I.A.No.2444/2013 in O.S.No.363/2009 and the order on I.A.No.3399/2013 in O.S.No.363/2009 on the file of the Sub Court, Tirur. Exts.P7 and P10 are the said orders. I do not find any reason to interfere with the order on I.A.No.2444/2013 as the respondent cannot be directed to produce passport for the purpose of comparing the signature. Therefore, there is no infirmity with the said order. However, in regard to the order on I.A.No.3399/2013, on the application for considering the service regarding interrogatories, this court is of the view that interrogatory Nos.1 and 2 can be allowed and the defendants directed to answer those interrogatories as it may be relevant in the matter of the dispute. Accordingly, Ext.P10 is set aside. I.A.No.3399/2013 in O.S.No.363/2009 is allowed.

The original petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

Sd/-

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ms