Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Ganesh Sharma Son Of Late Ram Swarup ... vs Religare Health Insurance Company ... on 6 February, 2019

Author: Sujit Narayan Prasad

Bench: Sujit Narayan Prasad

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                           W.P.(C) No.1721 of 2017

      Ganesh Sharma son of Late Ram Swarup Sharma, resident of 17,
      Deshbandhu Lane, Dimna Road, PO Mango, PS Mango (Olidih), District-
      East Singhbhum.
                                                                   ...... Petitioner
                                           Versus
      1.     Religare Health Insurance Company Limited through its Chief
      Executive Officer, office at D3, P3B, District Centre, Saket, New Delhi, PO
      and PS New Delhi, New Delhi 110017.
      2.     Authorized Signatory, Religare Health Insurance Company Limited,
      office at D3, P3B, District Centre, Saket, New Delhi, PO and PS New Delhi,
      New Delhi 110017.
      3.     Manager Customer Service, Religare Health Insurance Company
      Limited, office at D3, P3B, District Centre, Saket, New Delhi, PO and PS
      New Delhi, New Delhi 110017.
                                                                ...... Respondents
                                          -------

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

-------

For the Petitioner : Mr. Akshay Kr. Mahto, Advocate For the Respondents :

----------------------------

04/Dated 06th February, 2019 This writ petition has been filed for setting aside the letter dated 21.12.2016 issued by the respondent No.3 by which claim No.90242115 has finally been rejected.

It is evident from the pleadings that the relief as has been sought for against the respondents namely, Religare Health Insurance Company, who admittedly is not state within the meaning of Article 226 of the Constitution of India, therefore, the writ will not lie at this juncture.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to approach before the appropriate forum.

In view thereof, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of non- maintainability with the liberty to the petitioner to approach before the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance, if he so wishes.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) Saurabh