Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Patna High Court - Orders

Nagendra Singh vs The Union Of India & Ors on 27 June, 2011

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                        CWJC No.8625 of 2005
                                            -----------
                   Nagendra Singh, son of late Sukdeo Singh, resident of village
                   Mohammadpur, P.O. Teknewas, P.S. Mohammadpur, District
                   Gopalganju.
                                                              ..... Petitioner
                                             Versus
                   1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum,
                       New Delhi.
                   2. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited. Bombay through its
                       Chairman
                   3. The Chairman, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited. Head
                       Office, Bombay
                   4. The General Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited,
                       Calcutta
                   5. The Regional Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited,
                       Exhibition Road, Patna
                   6. Jitendra Prasad, son of late Ramagya Prasad, resident of village
                       Pyarepur, P.S. Barauli, District Gopalganj.
                                                              .... Respondents
                                             -------
                   For the Petitioner :            Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Advocate
                   For the Union of India :        Mrs. Nivedita Nirvikar, C.G.S.C.
                   For Respondents no. 2 to 6 :         None.
                                              -------

03/   27.06.2011

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for respondent-Union of India. No one appears for respondent-Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited and its authorities. No one also appears on behalf of respondent no. 6.

2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the appointment of respondent no.6 as retail outlet (petrol pump) dealer for the site located at NH 28, Muhammadpur Junction to NH 101, Muhammadpur Malmalia More in the district of Gopalganj and also for directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner as retail outlet (petrol pump) dealer for the site located at NH 28, Muhammadpur to NH 101, Muhammadpur Malmalia More in the district of Gopalganj as well as for other ancillary reliefs. 2

3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since six years have lapsed, he wants to withdraw this writ petition.

4. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

MPS/                             ( S. N. Hussain, J. )