Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Aruna Sathyamurthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2020

Author: Abhay S. Oka

Bench: Abhay S. Oka

                           -1-



     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

        DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2020

                        PRESENT

      THE HON'BLE MR.ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE

                           AND

        THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI

      WRIT PETITION NO.10194 OF 2020 (GM-POLICE-PIL)
BETWEEN:
1.      ARUNA SATHYAMURTHY
        W/O.NARENDRA KUMAR RAMANAN
        AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

2.      AYYAPPADAS BALAGOPAL
        S/O.NARAYANA PILLAI BALAGOPAL
        AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

3.      GAGAN DEEP SINGH
        S/O.RAJINDER SINGH KAINTH
        AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

4.      PARUL KHANNA
        W/O.AMIT MAHAJAN
        AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

5.      RAKESH R. PIMPLIKAR
        S/O.RAMESH PIMPLIKAR
        AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

6.      RAMESH MENON
        S/O.PEB MENON
        AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS

7.      SUJOY ROY
        S/O.LATE B.C.ROY
        AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS

8.      ADITYA GROVER
        S/O.PADAM P. GROVER
        AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
                          -2-


9.    AMIT MAHAJAN
      S/O.BISHAN DASS MAHAJAN
      AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

10.   ANSHIKA PANDITA
      W/O.GAGAN DEEP SINGH
      AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

11.   ANUBHAV GARG
      S/O.ATUL GARG
      AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

12.   ANUSH S.
      S/O.SEETHARAMAN T.
      AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

13.   BHAVANI
      W/O.NAVEEN
      AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

14.   JOHN KURUVILLA
      S/O.DR.J.T.KURUVILLA
      AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS

15.   K.C.SEKHAR
      S/O.P.B.MENON
      AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS

16.   KRISHNADAS
      S/O.BALAGOPAL PILLAI
      AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

17.   MEHTA S.DAMODARAN
      S/O.MR.S.DAMODARAN
      AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

18.   MOHIT MANGAL
      S/O.SUBHASH GUPTA
      AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

19.   MUNINDER SEERU
      S/O.MOTI LAL SEERU
      AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS

20.   MURALI BABU
      S/O.B.LAKSHMI NARAYANA
      AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
                           -3-


21.   NARENDRAKUMAR RAMANAN
      S/O.KRISHNAMURTHY VENKATA RAMANAN
      AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

22.   NAVEEN
      S/O.CHANDRAMOHAN
      AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

23.   PRAVEEN SATHYANARAYANA
      S/O.G.S.SATHYANARAYANA
      AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

24.   PREETHI MENON
      W/O.RAMESH MENON
      AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS

25.   PREETI
      W/O.ANUSH SEETHARAMAN
      AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

26.   PRIYANKAR BHIKSHU
      S/O.LATE GIAN BHIKASHU
      AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

27.   R.CHAKRABARTI
      S/O.AMITHABHA CHAKRABARTI
      AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

28.   SATYA
      S/O.LATE E.R.SRINIVASAN
      AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

29.   SESHADRI GOVINDAN
      S/O.GOVINDAN P.G.
      AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

30.   SHRAVAN MEHRA
      S/O.ANIL K. MEHRA
      AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

31.   SOHAN PHILIP
      S/O.PHILIP PHILIP
      AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

32.   SRINU
      S/O.A.TRINADHA RAO
      AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
                           -4-


33.    SUVOJIT ROYCHOWDHURY
       S/O.SUBHASH ROYCHOWDHURY
       AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

34.    SWATI SHROTRIYA
       W/O.VIKRANT SHROTRIYA
       AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

35.    TARA
       W/O.K.C.SHEKAR
       AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

36.    VEENA Y.
       W/O.SARAT GUTTIKONDA
       AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

37.    VEERANAGOUDA PATIL
       S/O.BASANAGOUDA PATIL
       AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

38.    VIKRANT SHROTRIYA
       S/O.HARIKANT SHROTRIYA
       AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

39.    VINAY TRIVEDI
       S/O.KAUSHIK TRIVEDI
       AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

40.    VINAYACHANDRA A.S.
       S/O.LAXMI NARAYANA AITHALA
       AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

41.    VRUSHALI DOIPHODE
       D/O.BABAN DOIPHODE
       AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

       ALL ARE RESIDING AT
       THE ICON NORTH APARTMENTS
       THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD
       THANISANDRA
       BENGALURU-560 045            ... PETITIONERS
(BY SMT.SUMANGALA A. SWAMY, ADVOCATE)

AND:
1.     THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
       DEPARTMENT OF HOME
                          -5-


     REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
     ROOM NO.123, 1ST FLOOR
     M.S.BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
     BENGALURU-560 001

2.   THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
     NO.2, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
     K.R.CIRCLE
     BENGALURU-560 001

3.   THE POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR (L & O)
     SAMPIGEHALLI POLICE STATION
     NEXT HEGADE NAGAR POLICE QUARTERS
     R.K.HEGDE NAGAR
     BENGALURU-560 077

4.   CHAIRMAN
     KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION
     CONTROL BOARD, NO.49, 5TH FLOOR
     CHURCH STREET
     BENGALURU-560 001

5.   THE PRESIDENT
     MASJID-E-RAZA
     FATHIMA LAYOUT
     BHARATH NAGAR
     BENGALURU-560 045

6.   THE PRESIDENT
     MASJID-E-GHOUSIA
     78/12/1, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD
     BHARATH NAGAR, STAGE I
     BENGALURU-560 045

7.   THE PRESIDENT
     MASJID-E-FATHIMA
     FATHIMA LAYOUT
     BHARATH NAGAR
     THANISANDRA
     BENGALURU-560 045

8.   THE PRESIDENT
     MASJID KERALA
     FATHIMA LAYOUT
     BHARATH NAGAR
     THANISANDRA
     BENGALURU-560 045
                           -6-


9.    THE PRESIDENT
      MASJID-AL-KHYYUM
      8, FIRST CROSS
      DURGAMBA ROAD
      AMARJYOTHI EXTENSION
      THANISANDRA
      BENGALURU-560 077

10.   THE PRESIDENT
      MASJID-AS-SAIF-AL SALAH
      (AKA MASJID USMA E GHANI)
      26TH CROSS, ASHWATH NAGAR
      HBR LAYOUT
      BENGALURU-560 045

11.   THE PRESIDENT
      MASJID-E-UQBA
      ASHWATH NAGAR
      SINTHAN NAGAR
      BENGALURU-560 045

12.   THE POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR (L & O)
      HENNUR POLICE STATION
      SERVICE ROAD
      BALACHANDRA ALYOUT
      BABUSAPALYA, HENNUR GARDENS
      BENGALURU-560 043                ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI VIJAYA KUMAR A. PATIL, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 & R12;
    SRI GURURAJ JOSHI, ADVOCATE FOR R4;
    SRI P. USMAN FOR HEGDE ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATE FOR
    R5 TO R11)
                           ---
      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE THIRD RESPONDENT INCLUDING
OTHER RESPONDENTS TO CONTROL THE NOISE POLLUTION
WHICH ARISE OUT OF THE USAGE OF THE LOUDSPEAKER IN
THE NAME OF RELIGIOUS PRAYER AND RELIGIOUS
CELEBRATIONS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND ETC.

       THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY,
CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                               -7-




                            ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that the nuisance created by use of loudspeakers by the concerned respondents (the respondent Nos.5 to 11) has stopped and therefore, no further direction is necessary.

2. At this stage, the learned counsel appearing for fifth to eleventh respondents states that they are willing to apply for grant of a licence to use loudspeakers. However, it is not clear the Authority before which the application can be made. We, therefore, direct the second respondent to communicate to the fifth to eleventh respondents the name and address of the Authority before which such application for grant of licence can be filed.

Subject to what is observed above, the petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-

JUDGE LB