Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Barak Valley Cements Ltd vs The Union Of India And 5 Ors on 14 December, 2020

Author: Soumitra Saikia

Bench: Soumitra Saikia

                                                               Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010146392020




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : WP(C)/4334/2020

         BARAK VALLEY CEMENTS LTD
         A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND
         HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 202, ROYAL VIEW, B.K. KAKOTI
         ROAD, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI, DIST-KAMRUP (M), ASSAM AND ITS
         INDUSTRIAL UNIT AT DEBENDRANAGAR, JHOOM BASTI,
         BADARPURGHAT, DIST-KARIMGNAJ, ASSAM. REPRESENTED BY SRI
         BANWARILAL PAREEK, THE MANAGER OF THE PETITIONER COMPANY

         VERSUS

         THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.
         REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,
         MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NORTH BLOCK,
         NEW DELHI-110001

         2:SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
          MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY
          DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION
          UDYOG BHAWAN
          NEW DELHI-110011

         3:JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
          MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY
          DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION
          UDYOG BHAWAN
          NEW DELHI-110011

         4:COMMISSIONER
          CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX
          GST BHAWAN
          KEDAR ROAD
          FANCY BAZAR
          GUWAHATI-781001

         5:ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
                                                                  Page No.# 2/3

             CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE DIVISION
             SILCHAR

            6:CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS
             REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
             MINISTRY OF FINANCE
             DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
             NORTH BLOCK
             NEW DELHI-11000

Advocate for the Petitioner   : DR. ASHOK SARAF

Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S C KEYAL (SC, GST)

            Linked Case : Cont.Cas(C)/594/2020

            BARAK VALLEY CEMENTS LTD
            A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT
            1956
            HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 202
            ROYAL VIEW
            B.K. KAKOTI ROAD
            ULUBARI
            GUWAHATI
            DIST. KAMRUP (M)
            ASSAM AND ITS INDUSTRIAL UNIT AT DEBENDRANAGAR
            JHOOM BASTI
            BADARPURGHAT
            DIST. KARIMGANJ
            ASSAM
            REP. BY SRI BANWARI LAL PAREEK
            THE MANAGER OF THE PETITIONER COMPANY.

             VERSUS

            DEEPAK ARORA AND 2 ORS
            THE THEN CHIEF COMMISSIONER
            GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE
            GUWAHATI AND PRESENTLY SERVING AS THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER
            GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE
            RANCHI.

            2:SHRI S. KANNAN
            CHIEF COMMISSIONER
             CGST
             CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS
             GUWAHATI ZONE
                                                                                  Page No.# 3/3

            GST BHAWAN
            KEDAR ROAD (NEAR AT ROAD FLYOVER) MACHKHOWA
            GUWAHATI-781001.
            3:SHRI ASHOTUSLH AWASTHI

            PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
            GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE
            GST BHAWAN
            KEDAR ROAD (NEAR AT ROAD FLYOVER) MACHKHOWA
            GUWAHATI-781001.
            ------------
            Advocate for : DR. A SARAF
            Advocate for : appearing for DEEPAK ARORA AND 2 ORS

                                     BEFORE
                      HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

                                          ORDER

Date : 14.12.2020 Mr. Keyal, learned standing counsel appearing for the GST and also representing the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3 submits on instructions that the order passed by this Court vide order dated 14.10.2020 has not been violated and the EWB Portal of the petitioner is not blocked as on date. He submits that in terms of the order dated 14.10.2020 the same shall not be blocked without leave of the Court. Dr. A. Saraf, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. P. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner also does not dispute the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Department.

In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the respondents that there is no violation of the order dated 14.12.2020 passed by this Court and that the EWB Portal of the petitioner has not been blocked and that it will not be blocked without leave of the Court, the contempt petition is closed and disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant