Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Anand Kumar & Another vs The State Of Haryana & Others on 27 January, 2009

Author: Ajay Tewari

Bench: Ajay Tewari

       IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
                   AT CHANDIGARH

                              CWP No.1189 of 2009
                              Date of decision: January 27, 2009

Anand Kumar & another                            ... Petitioners

                           Versus

The State of Haryana & others                    ... Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI

Present : Mr. Minderjeet Yadav, Advocate
          for the petitioners.

                      ***
1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see
the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral)

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners have the qualification of B.A. in Hindi as Elective subject and B.Ed. With Hindi as Teaching subject. The respondents have advertised post of Hindi Teacher wherein the main qualification prescribed was of Parbhakar/B.A.(Hons.) and the qualification possessed by the petitioners was prescribed as alternative qualification and it was mentioned that such persons would be called for interview only if adequate number of candidates having the higher qualifications are not available.

As regards that point, this Court has dismissed the CWP No.30 of 2009 entitled as Youdhveer Singh & another versus State of Haryana & others. Apart from this another argument raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners is that in the regulation of National Council for Teachers Education, New Delhi the qualification for Higher and Senior Secondary School CWP No.1189 of 2009 -2- Teacher is B.A. B.Ed. However, it may be noticed that these qualifications are minimum qualifications as is clear from the heading thereof which is as follows:

                 "National   Counsel       for    Teacher         Education

           (determination     of        minimum       qualifications    for

recruitment of teachers in schools) Regulations, 2001." It cannot be disputed that any employer can prescribe higher qualifications which is the case in the present advertisement.

Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

January 27, 2009                                 (AJAY TEWARI)
sonia                                                JUDGE