Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Bachhan Singh S/O Shri Ganga Singh ... vs State Of Rajasthan on 11 December, 2019

Author: Inderjeet Singh

Bench: Inderjeet Singh

       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

       S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7343/2019

1.      Bachhan Singh S/o Shri Ganga Singh Gurjar, Aged About
        24 Years, By Caste Gurjar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Vill.
        Khootla,    Police       Station         Sadar,         Gangapur     City,
        Sawaimadhopur, Presently R/o Flat No. 210, Patrakar
        Colony, Soni Enclave, Police Station Mansarovar, Jaipur.
2.      Virendra Singh Chauhan S/o Shri Man Singh, Aged About
        35 Years, Bt Caste Rajput, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 51,
        Park View Colony, N.b.c., Police Station Sadar, Jaipur
                                                                   ----Petitioners
                                   Versus
1.      State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2.      Sunil Gurjar S/o Shri Govind Singh Gurjar, R/o 96,
        Brahma Marg, Officer Campus, Opposite Sanskar School,
        Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur West, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (West).
                                                                 ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ganesh Chandra Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Ola, PP For Complainant(s) : Mr. S.L. Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order 11/12/2019

1. Instant criminal Miscellaneous petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the proceedings pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge and Metropolitan Magistrate No.14, Jaipur Metropolitan in Criminal Case No.396/2018 arising out of the F.I.R. No.681/2018 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (West) for the offence under Sections 427, 447, 453 and 454 of I.P.C.

(Downloaded on 17/12/2019 at 09:49:10 PM)

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-7343/2019]

2. It is submitted by counsel for the petitioners that the parties have entered into a compromise. Counsel further submits that in view of the compromise, both the parties jointly filed an application before the trial Court for compounding the offences under Sections 427, 447, 453 and 454 of I.P.C. The court below compounded the offence under Section 427 & 447 of I.P.C. but as offence under Section 453 & 454 of I.P.C. is non-compoundable, the same is not compounded.

3. The complainant alongwith his counsel present in court has not disputed this fact that they have entered into a compromise and they are living together peacefully.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case as also looking to the nature of dispute between the petitioners and the complainant and the fact that the parties have entered into a compromise, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the offences under Sections 453 & 454 of I.P.C. are compounded and the proceedings pending before the Court of Additional Civil Judge and Metropolitan Magistrate No.14, Jaipur Metropolitan in Criminal Case No.396/2018 titled as State Vs. Bachhan Singh & Ors are hereby quashed.

5. The stay application also stands disposed of.

(INDERJEET SINGH),J JYOTI /114 (Downloaded on 17/12/2019 at 09:49:10 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)