Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Decided On : 07.05.2025 vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Another on 7 May, 2025

Author: Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench: Ajay Mohan Goel

                                                                                       2025:HHC:13042


         IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT
                          SHIMLA

                                                                              CWP No. 7593 of 2025
                                                                             Decided on : 07.05.2025
M/s Aishwarya Lifesciences.
                                                                                        ...Petitioner
                                                          Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and another.
                                                                                     ...Respondents
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner :     Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Senior
                         Advocate, with Mr. Vikas
                         Rathore, Advocate
For the respondents :                                     Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal,
                                                          Additional Advocate General.

Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)

Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. With the consent of the parties, the petition is being disposed of at this stage.

3. The petitioner has suffered an order, Annexure P-7, passed by State Drug Controller, Controlling-cum-Licensing Authority, Baddi, in terms whereof in exercise of powers 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2

2025:HHC:13042 conferred upon the said Authority under Rule 85 (2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rule, 1995, the Authority has suspended product license to manufacture for sale and distribution the "Compound Sodium Lactate Injection IP" under generic name or any brand name under the manufacturing license possessed by the petitioner of the said product for one month commencing from 25.04.2025 to 24.05.2025.

4. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the petitioner has filed an Appeal against the said order, however, no stay has been granted and the next date fixed for the consideration of the appeal is 20.05.2025.

5. This Court is of the considered view that as the penalty imposed upon the petitioner itself comes to an end on 24.05.2025, hearing of Appeal on 20.05.2025 is not going to serve any purpose.

6. At this stage, learned Additional Advocate General on instruction submits that the Officer has assured that the Appeal will be positively decided within a period of two days from today. He submits that the petitioner through Counsel may appear before the Authority today itself. 3

2025:HHC:13042

7. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that needful will be done.

8. In the event of the petitioner through its representative/Counsel appearing before the Authority concerned today itself, the Authority is directed to dispose of the Appeal on merit, on or before 09.05.2025.

9. This Writ petition is disposed of accordingly, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 07, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)