Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Junaid vs The Fishermen Welfare And on 31 January, 2019

Author: Sathish Ninan

Bench: Sathish Ninan

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN

   THURSDAY ,THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 11TH MAGHA, 1940

                       OP(C).No. 2427 of 2017

          CMA 12/2017 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ATTINGAL



PETITIONER:


              JUNAID
              AGED 27 YEARS,S/O.FAROOQ, KADAYIL VEEDU,
              VALLAKKADAVUCHILAKKOOR, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
              IS REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER FAROOQ,
              AGED 58 YEARSS/O. MOHAMMEDKADAYIL VEEDU,
              VALLAKKADAVUCHILAKKOOR, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

              BY ADV. SRI.M.L.SURESH KUMAR


RESPONDENTS:
       1     THE FISHERMEN WELFARE AND
             DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, NO.DF(T)32/92,
             CHILAKKOORVARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695141.

      2       JAHANGIR,
              AGED 45 YEARS, SECRETARY, THE FISHERMEN WELFARE AND
              DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY NO.DF(T)32/92,
              CHILAKKOOR VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695141.

      3       SUMAYYA,
              AGED 52 YEARS, PRESIDENT, THE FISHERMEN WELFARE AND
              DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY NO.DF(T)32/92,
              CHILAKKOOR VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695141.

              BY ADVS.
              SMT.ANITHA RAVINDRAN
              SMT.S.SIKKY
              SMT.T.RESHMA
              SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR
              SRI.HARISANKAR N UNNI


THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31.01.2019, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 O.P.(C).No.2427 of 2017




                              JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. This submission is recorded and the original petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

SATHISH NINAN JUDGE rsr APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY DATED 10.2.2017 EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE OS NO 123/2017 OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, VARKALA EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE CMA NO 12/2017 OF SUB COURT, ATTINGAL EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE AUCTION NOTICE DATED 28.7.2017 PUBLISHED BY THE RESPONDENTS 2& 3 EXHIBIT P5 THE COPY OF IA.417/2017 IN CMA 12/2017 OF SUB COURT, ATINGAL.

RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE-R1B TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO. FDO/2016-17 DATED 23/12/2016 TO THE PETITIONER.
ANNEXURE-R1C TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES DATED 10/3/2017 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE-R1D TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 10/3/2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
ANNEXURE-R1E TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN OS NO. 123/2017 OF MUNSIFF COURT, VARKALA.
EXHIBIT R1 A TRUE COPY OF THE BYE-LAW OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.