Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 22]

Delhi High Court

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Subhash Rastogi & Ors. on 25 July, 2017

Author: R.K.Gauba

Bench: R.K.Gauba

$~R-95
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                            Decided on: 25thJuly, 2017
+      MAC APPEAL No. 438/2009

       NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.        ..... Appellant
                    Through: Mr. J.P. N. Shahi, Adv.

                             versus

       SUBHASH RASTOGI & ORS.                       ..... Respondents
                   Through:

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

                         JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. In the accident claim case (suit no. 132/07) based on the claim petition of the first and second respondents (claimants), decided by judgment dated 11.05.2009 of the motor accident claims tribunal, compensation was awarded in their favour and the liability was fastened on the appellant insurance company, it admittedly being the insurer of the offending vehicle for the period in question. It, however, appears that the insurance company had raised the plea of breach of terms and conditions of the policy, its concerns having been that the driver (the third respondent herein) was not holding a valid or effective driving license. The tribunal, however, held otherwise and declined to accept the defence of the insurer.

2. In appeal, the only contention urged is that the driving license proved was valid for light motor vehicle (LMV), the offending vehicle MAC Appeal No.438/2008 Page 1 of 2 being a light goods vehicle (LGV). This contention must be rejected with reference to the law laid down by Supreme Court in Mukund Dewangan Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., 2017 (7) Scale 731.

3. Thus, the appeal is found devoid of substance and is dismissed.

4. The statutory amount shall be refunded.

R.K.GAUBA, J.

JULY25, 2017 nk MAC Appeal No.438/2008 Page 2 of 2