Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Leighton International Limited & 2 vs Gavin John Hodge & on 10 April, 2014

Author: R.M.Chhaya

Bench: R.M.Chhaya

       O/OJMCA/57/2013                                     ORDER



      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

       MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION  NO. 57 of 2013

     In MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.  202 of 2012
===================================================
LEIGHTON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED  &  2....Applicant(s)
                        Versus
       GAVIN JOHN HODGE  &  1....Respondent(s)
===================================================
Appearance:
MR VIRAT G POPAT, ADVOCATE for Applicant(s) Nos.1­3
SINGHI & CO, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2.1
===================================================
      CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA
                  Date : 10/04/2014
                      ORAL ORDER

Heard Mr.Virat G. Popat, learned advocate for  the   applicants,   and   Mr.Bijal   Chhatrapati   with  Mr.Pranjal   Buch,   learned   advocates   for   Singhi   &  Co. for the opponents.

By   this   application   the   applicants   have  prayed for the following reliefs:

"(a) To allow this application;
(b) That the concerned opponents i.e. (1) Mr.Sandip  Adani,   Dy.   General   Manager,   PMC   Project   (I)   Pvt. 

Ltd.   and   (2)   Mr.Kailash   Verma   (on   behalf   of  Mr.Gautam   Adani­Chairman   and   Managing   Director   of  Mundra   Port   and   Special   Economic   Zone   Ltd)   be  summoned/directed   to   furnish   the   documents   as  appended to the Letter of Request dated 04.09.2012  issued by Hon'ble Supreme Court of New South Wales  in   Suit   No.2011­137985   pending   in   the   said   Court  between the applicant and respondent No.1;

(c)   To   clarify   that  the   Hon'ble  Commissioner  has  the   powers   to   examine,   decide   and   adjudicate  objections   as   per   provisions   of   Code   of   Civil  Procedure,   1908   and   further   be   pleased   to   direct  the   Hon'ble   Commissioner   to   procure   documents  mentioned in the letter of request dated 04.09.2012  issued by Hon'ble Supreme Court of New South Wales  Page 1 of 3 O/OJMCA/57/2013 ORDER in Suit No.2011­137985 expeditiously.

(d)   To   take   appropriate   action   under   Rule   10   of  Order 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908;

(e)   Pending admission, hearing and final disposal  of the present application, the concerned opponents  i.e. (1) Mr.Sandip Adani, Dy. General Manager, PMC  Project (I) Pvt. Ltd. and (2) Mr.Kailash Verma (on  behalf   of   Mr.Gautam   Adani­Chairman   and   Managing  Director of Mundra Port and Special Economic Zone  Ltd)   be   directed   to   furnish   the   documents   as  appended to the Letter of Request dated 04.09.2012  issued by Hon'ble Supreme Court of New South Wales  in   Suit   No.2011­137985   pending   in   the   said   Court  between the applicant and respondent No.1;

(f)   To   dispense   with   the   filing   of   affidavit   as  the   facts   are   taken   from   record   of   the   main  application.

(g)  To pass such other and further order(s) as may  be deem just and proper in the circumstances of the  case."

It  may  be  noted  that   in the  main   matter  by  order dated 07.01.2013 this Court has observed as  under (at Paragraph No.4 [d]) :

"[d]   A   copy   of   the   order   shall   be   given   to   the  person nominated by the Registrar (Judicial)  for   compliance   of   the   order   with   the  observation that any resistance by the other  side   shall   not   be   adjudicated   by   him   but  shall   be   recorded   and   report   shall   be  submitted   before   this   Court   on   the   next  date."

By   this   application,   the   applicants   have  sought for further reliefs and none of the prayer  is   in   the   form   of   review   of   earlier   order   and  therefore such application is not maintainable as  a review.

It   may   further   be   noted   that   even   in   this  application, the opponents have filed a detailed  Page 2 of 3 O/OJMCA/57/2013 ORDER affidavit­in­reply and have dealt with the aspect  of   availability  and/or  non­availability   of   a  particular   document   (at   Paragraph   No.9).  Commissioner has not filed any report till date.  Learned advocate for the applicants has submitted  that   the   applicants   have   already   intimated   the  commissioner   by  communication   dated  26.02.2013.  Commissioner appointed as per earlier order dated  07.01.2013   shall   consider  communication   dated  26.02.2013   and   place   a   report   on   record   of   the  main   application   being   Misc.   Civil   Application  No.202   of   2012.   It   would   be   open   for   the  opponents   to   respond   to   the   said  communication  dated  26.02.2013 latest by 09.05.2014 and report  thereof shall be submitted by Commissioner  on or  before 01.07.2014.

In   light   of   the   aforesaid,   the   present  application stands disposed of.

Sd/­       [R.M.CHHAYA, J ] ***  Bhavesh [pps]*   Page 3 of 3