Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 28]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Smt. Raj Rani And Another vs Ashwani Kumr And Others on 3 March, 2014

Author: K. Kannan

Bench: K. Kannan

             FAO No.2250 of 1997                                             -1-

                IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                                       CHANDIGARH

                                                      FAO No.2250 of 1997
                                                      Date of Decision.03.03.2014

             Smt. Raj Rani and another                                 ......Appellants

                                                   Versus

             Ashwani Kumr and others                                   .....Respondents

             Present:          None for the appellants.

                               Mr. Pradeep Goyal, Advocate
                               for the insurance company.

             CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN

             1.  Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the
                 judgment ? No
             2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No
             3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No
                                              -.-
             K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)

1. The original papers have been burnt in a fire accident that took place on 31.01.2011. A Committee was constituted and papers have been reconstructed with the assistance of the counsel who supplied the copies. Wherever information was available regarding the status of service and counsel were appearing, the cause list gave those details and cases were taken up for hearing. In respect of cases where there was no counsel on record and papers could not be reconstructed, notice had been sent to parties as found in the court registers. In respect of some cases, persons have responded and in many cases nobody has responded.

2. In the above case, the papers have been reconstructed and the cause list gives names of counsel of both sides. There is no representation for the appellants at the time when the matter is called. Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2014.03.06 11:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh FAO No.2250 of 1997 -2- The appeal is dismissed for default of appearance and non prosecution.

3. Copy of the order may be dispatched to the parties/counsel whose name appear in the cause list.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 03, 2014 Pankaj* Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2014.03.06 11:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh