Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur
Rahul S/O Shri Vishambhar @ Kalwa vs State Of Rajasthan on 26 August, 2022
Author: Birendra Kumar
Bench: Birendra Kumar
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 428/2022
Rahul S/o Shri Vishambhar @ Kalwa
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishram Prajapati For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Meena, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR Order 26/08/2022 The petitioner-Rahul, who is a convict and undergoing imprisonment has approached this Court through his wife for grant of emergent parole for a period of thirty days on the ground that his wife wants progeny.
The petitioner or his wife has not disclosed whether they have any children or not.
Let the petitioner file affidavit in this regard. A Division Bench of this Court in Nand Lal Vs. State & Ors. reported in D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.10/2022 decided on 05.04.2022 was confronted with the same issue and concluded as follows:-
"As an upshot of the observations made herein above, we are of the considered view that though there is no express provision in the Rajasthan Prisoners Release On Parole Rules, 2021 for releasing the prisoner on parole on the ground of his wife to have progeny; yet considering the religious philosophies, cultural, sociological and humanitarian (Downloaded on 30/08/2022 at 12:03:14 AM) (2 of 2) [CRLW-428/2022] aspects, coupled with the fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution of India and while exercising extra ordinary power vested in it, this Court deem it just and proper to allow the instant writ petition."
The order of the Division Bench was challenged before the Hon'ble Supreme Court by the State of Rajasthan in SLP (Criminal) Diary No.21875/2022, State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Nand Lal. While disposing of the application on 01.08.2022, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed as follows:-
"While we have reservations on some of the observations made in the impugned order, we are not inclined to interfere with the direction which would have been implemented. However, it is clarified that it will be open to the petitioners to raise all pleas and contentions before the High Court. In case any third person applies for parole/furlough giving same/similar reason. Such plea and contention would be examined on merits."
Since the matter had already been decided by a Division Bench and in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, a fresh look is required on the grounds raised by the State respondent. Hence, the matter needs to be heard by a Larger Bench.
Let the matter be placed before Hon'ble the Chief Justice for necessary order.
(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J Sunita/1 (Downloaded on 30/08/2022 at 12:03:14 AM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)