Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 1]

Central Information Commission

Mr.S C Kaushik vs Department Of Expenditure on 9 September, 2011

                           Central Information Commission
                Room No. 305, 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, 
                        Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi­110066
                       Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26167931

                                                             Case No. CIC/SS/A/2011/000826

Name of Appellant                       :       Shri S.C. Kaushik

Name of Respondent                      :     Ministry of Finance,
                                        Department of Expenditure

Date of Hearing                         :       25.08.2011

                                            ORDER

Shri S.C. Kaushik, the appellant has filed this appeal dated 21.12.2010 before the Commission against the Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure, New Delhi for not providing information to his RTI-request dated 25.10.2010. The matter came up for hearing on 25.08.2011. The appellant was present in person, whereas the respondents were represented by Smt. Renu Jain, Director and Shri Jagdish Chander, Deputy Secretary.

2. The appellant filed RTI-request dated 25.10.2010 seeking clarification pertaining to anomaly in respect grade pay of ex-cadre posts similar to Assistants of CSS cadre after implementation of 6th CPC. The CPIO vide letter No. 13(137)/2010-RTI dated 9.11.2010 informed the appellant that as per section 2(f) read with Section 2(j) of the RTI Act, the public authority can only provide information which is available in any material form. Since no information is available in material form, hence no information can be provided.

3. Aggrieved by reply of CPIO, the appellant preferred first-appeal before FAA 19.11.2010. The FAA vide order No. AA/240/10 dated 2.12.2010 upheld the reply of CPIO.

4. After hearing the parties and on perusal of relevant documents, the Commission observes that requisite information permissible under the RTI Act 2 Case No. CIC/SS/A/2011/000826 has been provided to the appellant. For redressal of his grievance, the appellant is advised to represent his case before the competent authority of his parent Department where is working The matter is accordingly disposed of with above observation.

` (Sushma Singh) Information Commissioner 09.09.2011 Authenticated true copy:

(K.K. Sharma) OSD & Deputy Registrar Address of the parties:
Shri S.C. Kaushik, H. No. 937, Sector-8, R.K. Puram, New Delhi-110022.
The CPIO, Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure, North Block, New Delhi-110001.
The First Appellate Authority, Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure, North Block, New Delhi-110001.