Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 8]

Bombay High Court

Jyoti R Panickar vs National Faceless Assessment Centre ... on 25 April, 2022

Author: N.R. Borkar

Bench: K.R. Shriram, N.R. Borkar

                                                                              934-cwp-5084-22.doc

           Digitally
           signed by
           DINESH
                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
DINESH
SADANAND
           SADANAND
           SHERLA                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SHERLA
                                               WRIT PETITION NO. 5084 OF 2022
           Date:
           2022.04.25
           18:55:34
           +0500


                        Jyoti R. Panickar                            ... Petitioner
                               V/s.
                        National Faceless Assessment
                        Centre and ors.                              ... Respondents

                                                      ----------------
                        Mr. Percy Pardiwalla, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Devendra Jain i/b DHJ Legal
                        for the Petitioner.
                        Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondent.
                                                      ----------------


                                                          CORAM      :     K.R. SHRIRAM &
                                                                           N.R. BORKAR, JJ.
                                                           DATE      :     APRIL 25, 2022.

                        P.C.

                        1]        The case of petitioner is that the amounts which are alleged to

have escaped income are all investments which were in the joint name with her husband and those amounts have been declared in the return of income filed by the husband.

2] Mr. Pardiwalla states that notwithstanding giving explanation and also explaining that petitioner was in U.S.A., no time has been granted.

Dinesh Sherla 1/2

934-cwp-5084-22.doc 3] Mr. Suresh Kumar seeks three weeks time to file reply. Time granted. Rejoinder, if any, to be filed within two weeks thereafter.

4]       Stand over to 22.06.2022.



5]       Ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (d) is granted until

25.06.2022.




                (N.R. BORKAR, J.)                    (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)




Dinesh Sherla                                                               2/2