Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

State Of Karnataka vs Selvi J. Jayalalitha . on 5 April, 2016

Bench: Pinaki Chandra Ghose, Amitava Roy

                                                 1

  ITEM NO.4                             COURT NO.9                 SECTION IIB
  (Part-heard)
                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

  Petition(s)   for                Special   Leave   to   Appeal     (Crl.)      No(s).
  6117-6120/2015

  (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated
  11/05/2015 in CRLA No. 835/2014, CRLA No. 836/2014, CRLA No.
  837/2014 and CRLA No. 838/2014 passed by the High Court Of
  Karnataka At Bangalore)


  STATE OF KARNATAKA                                                 Petitioner(s)

                                                VERSUS

  SELVI J. JAYALALITHA & ORS.                                        Respondent(s)


  WITH

  SLP(Crl) Nos. 6294-6297/2015

  (With appln.(s) permission to file additional documents and
  permission to file lengthy list of dates and Interim Relief and
  Office Report)


  SLP(Crl) Nos. 6121-6126/2015


  (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned
  judgment, permission to file additional documents and permission
  to file lengthy list of dates and Interim Relief and Office
  Report)

  SLP(Crl) Nos. 7107-7112/2015

  (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned
  judgment and permission to file lengthy list of dates and Interim
  Relief and Office Report)

  Date : 05/04/2016
Signature Not Verified
                                   These petitions were called on for hearing
Digitally signed by
                                   today.
R.NATARAJAN
Date: 2016.04.05
17:06:08 IST
  CORAM :
Reason:


                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY
                                   2

For Petitioner(s)   Mr. B.V. Acharya, Sr. Adv.
                    Mr. B.L. Acharya, Adv.
                    Mr. Sandesh Chouta, Adv.
                    Mr. Joseph Aristotle S., AOR
                    Mrs. Priya Aristotle, Adv.
                    Ms. Priyanka Gladson, Adv.

                    Mr. T.R. Andhyarujina, Sr. Adv.
                    Mr. R. Shunmuga Sundaram, Sr. Adv.
                    Mr. V. G. Pragasam, AOR
                    Mr. S. Prabu Ramasubramanian, Adv.
                    Mr. Siddharth Sijoria, Adv.
                    Mr. Soumik Ghosal, Adv.
                    Mrs. J. Shreshta, Adv.

                    Mr. Madhu S. Naik, Advocate General
                    Ms. Anitha Shenoy, AOR

For Respondent(s)   Dr. Subramanian Swamy, Intervenor-in-person
                    Dr. Roxna Swamy, Adv.

                    Mr.   L. Nageswara Rao, Sr. Adv.
                    Mr.   Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv.
                    Mr.   B. Kumar, Sr. Adv.
                    Mr.   C. Manishankar, Adv.
                    Mr.   S. Senthil, Adv.
                    Mr.   A. Asokan, Adv.
                    Mr.   Gaurav Agrawal, AOR
                    Mr.   J. Karupaiya, Adv.
                    Mr.   K.C. Paneer Selvam, Adv.
                    Mr.   Dhanjeyan, Adv.
                    Mr.   N. Bharani Kumar, Adv.
                    Mr.   Krishnamoorthy, Adv.
                    Mr.   S.N.D. Kulasekaran, Adv.
                    Mr.   Mayank Pandey, Adv.
                    Mr.   Hari Kumar G. Nair, Adv.
                    Mr.   Gautam Bharadwaj, Adv.
                    Mr.   Gautam Shivshankar, Adv.
                    Mr.   V. Prabhu, Adv.
                    Mr.   Rajkumar, Adv.


                    Mr. Jay Kishor Singh, AOR

                    Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan, AOR

                    Mr. Raghavendra S. Srivatsa, AOR

                    Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR
                                    3

          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                             O R D E R

Mr. L. Nageswara Rao, learned senior counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1 resumed his arguments at 10.50 a.m. and was on his legs when the Court rose for the day, leaving the matters as part-heard.

During the course of hearing, Mr. L. Nageswara Rao, learned Senior counsel has given two spiral bound Volume Nos. 4 and 6 containing the compilation of judgments in the Court today, which are taken on record.

List these matters tomorrow i.e. Wednesday, the 6th April, 2016 as part-heard.



    (R.NATARAJAN)                             (SNEH LATA SHARMA)
     Court Master                                Court Master



Case-law cited:-

By Mr. L.Nageswara Rao, learned senior counsel:

The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1971) 1 SCC 284 (1975) 4 SCC 428 at 438 (1976) 4 SCC 9 (1983) 3 SCC 118 paras 122-123 (1996) 7 SCC 349 at 364 (Para 18) (2007) 4 SCC 415