Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Delhi Subordinate Services Selection ... vs Paras Goel on 1 May, 2024

Author: Rekha Palli

Bench: Rekha Palli

                                    $~57
                                    *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                    +    W.P.(C) 6088/2024
                                         DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD DSSSB
                                         AND ANR                                    ..... Petitioners
                                                          Through: Mr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate

                                                                                      versus

                                                PARAS GOEL                                                                     ..... Respondent
                                                                                      Through:                Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate
                                                CORAM:
                                                HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
                                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
                                                              ORDER

% 01.05.2024

1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks to assail the order dated 04.12.2023 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal in OA No.4372/2017. Vide the impugned order, the learned Tribunal has, by relying on its decision in OA No. 708/2019 titled Arvind Dabas & Ors vs GNCTD & Ors, allowed the Original Application filed by the respondent, thereby quashing the upholding notice dated 10.11.2017, whereunder the candidature of the respondent for the post of TGT (Computer Science) was rejected.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the impugned order is liable to be set aside as the learned Tribunal has failed to appreciate that the factual matrix of the present case is different from the position in Arvind Dabas (supra), wherein, unlike the respondent in the present case who possesses a B.Tech degree in Software Engineering, the applicant therein was holding a master's degree.

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2024 at 22:17:16

3. From a perusal of the impugned order, we find that this plea that the decision in Arvind Dabas (supra) is not applicable to the present case on account of the difference in qualification was not taken by the petitioners before the learned Tribunal. When faced with this position, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the learned Tribunal by way of a review petition.

4. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for making it clear that if a review petition is preferred by the petitioners within two weeks from today, the same would be considered on merits and not be rejected on the ground of delay.

REKHA PALLI, J SAURABH BANERJEE, J MAY 1, 2024/So This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2024 at 22:17:16