Madhya Pradesh High Court
Hukumchand Solanki vs Panchayat And Rural Development ... on 12 September, 2023
Author: Subodh Abhyankar
Bench: Subodh Abhyankar
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBODH ABHYANKAR
ON THE 12 th OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
WRIT PETITION No. 19117 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
HUKUMCHAND SOLANKI S/O NANURAM SOLANKI,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION: ROJGAR
SAHAYAK/ASSISTANT PANCHAYAT SECRETARY
VILLAGE SINDRANI JANPAD PANCHAYAT KANNOD
DISTRICT DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI JITENDRA VERMA, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. COM M IS S ION ER UJJAIN DIVISION UJJAIN
(MADHYA PRADESH)
3. THE PROGRAMME OFFICER / CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER JILA PANCHAYAT DEWAS (MADHYA
PRADESH)
4. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER JANPAD
PANCHAYAT, KANNOD (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. GRAM PANCHAYAT SINDRANI THROUGH
SARPANCH GRAM PANCHAYAT SINDRANI
JANPAD PANCHAYAT KANNOD DISTRICT DEWAS
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY MS. ASHI VAIDYA, P.L./G.A.)
This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
Signature Not Verified
ORDER
Signed by: BAHAR CHAWLA Signing time: 12-09-2023 18:17:51 2 With the consent, heard finally.
The grievance of the petitioner is that before passing the order of termination dated 07.01.2020 no inquiry was conducted. The petitioner was posted as Gram Rojgar Sahayak and has relied upon a decision rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P. No.22742 of 2019 dated 28.04.2022 and it is submitted that in the aforesaid case this Court has also relied upon another decision passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P. No.21881 of 2019 (Vikram Singh Davar Vs. Panchayat and Social Justice Department & Others) decided on 04.04.2022 and thus, it is submitted that the aforesaid judgement would be applied mutatis mutandis to the facts of the present case.
Counsel for the respondents/State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer and it is submitted that the petitioner was issued notices before conducting the inquiry, however, there is nothing on record to demonstrate that the notices, which have been placed on record by the respondents, were ever served on the petitioner.
In view of the same, this Court is inclined to allow this petition in terms of the order passed by this Court in W.P. No.22742 of 2019.
Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of by directing that the order passed in the case of Vikram Singh Davar (Supra) shall be applied mutatis mutandis with full force to the present petitioner.
The respondents are directed to act in accordance with the direction contained in Vikram Singh Davar (supra).
Signature Not Verified Signed by: BAHAR CHAWLA Signing time: 12-09-2023 18:17:51 3(SUBODH ABHYANKAR) JUDGE Bahar Signature Not Verified Signed by: BAHAR CHAWLA Signing time: 12-09-2023 18:17:51