Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Vijay Chauhan vs State Of H.P. & Others on 29 November, 2017

Bench: Sanjay Karol, Sandeep Sharma

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 2692 of 2017-J .

Date of Decision: November 29, 2017 Vijay Chauhan ...Petitioner.

Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents. Coram:

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice.
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners: Mr. Naresh Kumar Tomar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with M/s Romesh Verma, & Anup Rattan, Additional Advocate Generals, Kush Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents NO.1 to 4-State.
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral).
Without pressing the petition on merits, learned counsel for the petitioners, under instructions, submits that petitioner shall be content if he is permitted to file representation within a period of two weeks from today, venting out his grievances.

2. Mr.Kush Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General has no objection to the same. He assures that 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

::: Downloaded on - 30/11/2017 23:54:32 :::HCHP 2

on receipt of such representation, respondent No.3/competent authority shall expeditiously consider and decide the same, in accordance with law.

.

3. No other point is urged.

4. As such, present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3/competent authority to consider and decide the petitioner's representation, in accordance with law, by affording adequate opportunity of hearing to all concerned, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. Needless to add, if the order is not in favour of the petitioner, the authority shall assign reasons while deciding the same, which shall be communicated to the petitioner. Liberty reserved to the petitioner to place additional material on record, if any.

With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any.

(Sanjay Karol), Acting Chief Justice.



    November 29, 2017                              (Sandeep Sharma),
         (Purohit)                                         Judge.




                                                   ::: Downloaded on - 30/11/2017 23:54:32 :::HCHP