Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 7]

Supreme Court of India

Chief Manager Rajasthan State Road ... vs Vinod Kumar Sharma on 25 September, 2018

Equivalent citations: AIR 2018 SC (SUPP) 1365, 2019 (14) SCC 595, (2018) 13 SCALE 665, (2018) 159 FACLR 444, (2018) 2 WLC(SC)CVL 715, (2018) 3 CURLR 677, (2019) 1 SERVLR 119, AIRONLINE 2018 SC 765

Author: Abhay Manohar Sapre

Bench: S.Abdul Nazeer, Abhay Manohar Sapre

                                                                  Non­Reportable

                              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               CIVIL APPEAL No.9957  OF 2018
                          (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.26347 of 2018)
                                     (D.No.23039 of 2018) 


                         Chief Manager, Rajasthan State 
                         Road Transport Corporation, Alwar ….Appellant(s)


                                               VERSUS


                         Vinod Kumar Sharma                           …Respondent(s)


                                          J U D G M E N T




                         Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and   order   dated   06.02.2018   passed   by   the   High Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur ANITA MALHOTRA Date: 2018.09.25 15:52:40 IST in   D.B.   Special   Appeal   Writ   No.   1960   of   2017 Reason:

1

whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by   the   appellant   herein   and   thus   confirmed   the order dated 18.08.2017 passed by the Single Judge of   the   said   High   Court   in   S.B.   Civil   Writ   Petition No.14368   of   2011,   which   arose   out   of   the   award dated   25.07.2011   passed   by   the   Industrial Tribunal­cum­Magistrate Court, Alwar.

3. Few facts need mention for the disposal of the appeal hereinbelow.

4. The appellant is the employer­ Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation. The respondent is the employee   working   at   all   relevant   time   with   the appellant on the post of Conductor.

5. The   dispute   relates   to   dismissal   of   the respondent   from   the   services   on   the   ground   of misconduct   committed by   him   while  on  duty.  The dismissal   of   the   respondent   is   based   on   domestic inquiry.

6. The   dispute   in   relation   to   the   respondent's dismissal was dealt with by the Industrial Tribunal 2 at the instance of the respondent­employee with a view to decide its legality and correctness. 

7. It was   then  carried to the High Court in two rounds earlier which eventually led to passing of the impugned order by the Division Bench in an appeal filed   by   the   appellant   herein   and   now   finally   it   is before   this   Court   at   the   instance   of   the   employer (Rajasthan   State   Road   Transport   Corporation) against   the   dismissal   of   their   appeal   by   the   High Court.

8. We   heard   the  learned  counsel  for   the  parties and   perused   the   impugned   order   of   the   Division Bench. 

9. We are constrained to observe that on reading the impugned order, it is difficult to discern much less appreciate the factual and legal controversy in its   proper   perspective.   The   reasons   are   not   far   to seek.

10. The   impugned   order   has   neither   set   out   the facts   properly   nor   the   findings   of   the   Tribunal 3 clearly   and   Single   Judge   and   nor   dealt   with   any submissions   urged   by   both   the   counsel   and   nor given   its   reasoning   keeping   in   view   the   law   laid down by this Court on the issues arising in the case to   justify   the   dismissal   of   the   appeal   filed   by   the employer (appellant herein). 

11. In substance, we are not able to appreciate the slip   short   narration   of   the   facts   and unsubstantiated   reasoning   in   support   of   the conclusion arrived at by the Division Bench.

12. For   these   reasons,   we   do   not   wish   to   probe into the factual and legal issues arising in the case and   instead   allow   the   appeal,   set   aside   the impugned   order   and   remand   the   case   to   the Division   Bench   of  the High  Court  for  deciding  the appeal   afresh   on   merits   keeping   in   view   the aforementioned observations made by us. 

13. The   appeal   thus   succeeds   and  is   accordingly allowed.   Impugned   order   is   set   aside.   The   case   is remanded   to   the   Division   Bench   for   deciding   the 4 intra Court appeal afresh on merits in accordance with law. Since we form an opinion to remand the case   to   the   Division   Bench,   we  refrain   from   going into the merits of the case and, therefore, the High Court will decide the appeal uninfluenced by any of our observations.

14. We request the High Court to decide the appeal as   expeditiously   as   possible   preferably   within   6 months. 

               

………...................................J. [ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE]                                       …...……..................................J.               [S.ABDUL NAZEER] New Delhi;

September 25, 2018  5