Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Narinder Kumar & Ors vs Anjali Bhawra & Ors on 31 October, 2014

Author: Augustine George Masih

Bench: Augustine George Masih

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                                     CHANDIGARH
           232
                                                          COCP No.161 of 2014
                                                          Date of Decision: October 31, 2014

           Narinder Kumar and others
                                                                                    ...Petitioners

                                                  Versus

           Anjali Bhawra and others
                                                                                  ...Respondents

           CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

           Present:            Mr. R.K. Arora, Advocate
                               for the petitioners.

                               Mr. Anant Kataria, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.


           AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL)

Reply by way of affidavit on behalf of respondent No.2 filed in Court, taken on record, copy supplied to the counsel for the petitioners.

Counsel for the petitioners states that in the light of the details of payment given in Annexure R-1, the present contempt petition has been rendered infructuous.

Disposed of accordingly.

Rule discharged.



           October 31.10.2014                             (AUGUSTINEGEORGE MASIH)
           Puneet/Harish                                           JUDGE




HARISH KUMAR
2014.11.03 14:28
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document