Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

The President (Formerly The Special ... vs The Appellate Authority Under Section ... on 26 October, 2022

Author: S.Srimathy

Bench: S.Srimathy

                                                                        W.P.(MD)No.16901 of 2015




                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED: 26.10.2022

                                                     CORAM

                                  THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

                                          W.P.(MD)No.16901 of 2015
                                                   and
                                          W.M.P.(MD)No.6099 of 2016
                                                   and
                                            M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015

                     The President (Formerly the Special Officer),
                     Tamil Nadu Fire Service and Aided School Employees
                      Co-operative Thrift and Credit Society Ltd.,
                     Chinthamani Super Market Complex, Puththur,
                     Thiruchirappalli.                              ... Petitioner

                                                      Vs.
                     1. The Appellate Authority Under Section 41 of
                         Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act,
                        (Deputy Commissioner of Labour),
                        Kajamalai Colony, Thiruchirappalli.

                     2. V.Ramesh                                       ... Respondents

                     PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the
                     records of the first respondent, in his file T.N.S.E.No.3 of 2012, quash
                     the order dated 21.04.2015, passed therein.


                     1/6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                             W.P.(MD)No.16901 of 2015




                                     For Petitioner    : Mr.S.Seenivasagam

                                     For R1            : Mr.C.Baskaran
                                                         Government Advocate (Civil side)

                                     For R2            : No appearance



                                                        ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed for Writ of Certiorari, to quash the impugned order passed by the first respondent, in his file T.N.S.E.No.3 of 2012, dated 21.04.2015.

2. The second respondent was an employee who was working as President in the Tamil Nadu Fire Service and Aided School Employees Cooperative Thrift and Credit Society Ltd. A Charge Memo, dated 17.10.2006 was issued against the second respondent alleging that the second respondent has forged the document and has issued loans to certain persons and has also issued open cheque and withdrawn the money which is not paid to the respective employees. The second 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.16901 of 2015 respondent and the other Secretary have committed this serious offence. Therefore, the petitioner Society has initiated domestic enquiry as well as criminal proceedings.

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner Society submitted that in the criminal case in C.C.No.304 of 2010, dated 18.05.2018 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchirappalli, the petitioner and the co-accused, Gurunathan, were convicted for the offences committed Section 408, 467, 468, 471, 477(A) of IPC and imposed punishment of two years imprisonment along with Rs.6,000/- for the petitioner and the co-accused, Gurunathan.

4. At this stage, this writ petition came up for hearing to set aside the impugned order passed by the Authority under Shops and Establishments Act. The Authority under Shops and Establishments Act had set aside the order of punishment of dismissal from service and directed the writ petitioner / employer to reinstate the delinquent. Since the second respondent convicted in criminal, at this stage, the second 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.16901 of 2015 respondent cannot be reinstated into service. The punishment imposed in the domestic enquiry is confirmed and the impugned order passed by the Authority under Shops and Establishments Act is set aside.

5. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner Society is not aware of whether the second respondent has preferred any criminal appeal against the conviction. Therefore, this Court is granting liberty to the second respondent, to challenge the domestic enquiry afresh, in case he succeeds in criminal appeal.

6. With the above said direction, this Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.




                                                                                  26.10.2022

                     Index          :      Yes / No
                     Internet       :      Yes / No
                     jbr




                     4/6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                   W.P.(MD)No.16901 of 2015


                     To

The Appellate Authority Under Section 41 of Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, (Deputy Commissioner of Labour), Kajamalai Colony, Thiruchirappalli.

5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.16901 of 2015 S.SRIMATHY, J jbr Order made in W.P.(MD)No.16901 of 2015 26.10.2022 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis