Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Krishnaraj Pratap Thaker vs Yatin Hariram Ruparel And Ors And ... on 8 August, 2024

Author: N. J. Jamadar

Bench: N. J. Jamadar

                                                 14-IA(L)-9968-2022.doc




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
               TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION

                 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 392 OF 2021
                                 IN
                TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 377 OF 2008

 Bhavana Harish Ruparel And Ors       ...Applicants
       Versus
 Yatin Hariram Ruparel and Ors.       ...Respondents
                            WITH
          INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 3334 OF 2021
                              IN
           TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 377 OF 2008

 Yatin Hariram Ruparel                      ...Applicant
       Versus
 Shantadevi Ruparel                         ...Respondent
                                WITH
                 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2376 OF 2022
                                  IN
                TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 377 OF 2008

 Krishnaraj Pratap Thaker             ...Applicant
       Versus
 Yatin Hariram Ruparel And Ors &
  Shantadevi Ruparel (deceased)       ...Respondents
                             WITH
          INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 8791 OF 2022
                               IN
           TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 377 OF 2008

 Mr.Yatin Hariram Ruparel                   ...Applicant
       Versus
 Shantadevi Hariram Ruparel                 ...Respondent
                                 WITH
                INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 9968 OF 2022
                                  IN
                 TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 377 OF 2008



 D.A.ETHAPE                       1 of 3




::: Uploaded on - 08/08/2024               ::: Downloaded on - 09/08/2024 12:28:15 :::
                                                           14-IA(L)-9968-2022.doc



 Yatin Hariram Ruparel                ...Applicant
       Versus
 Shantadevi Ruparel (deceased)        ...Respondent
                             WITH
         INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 15054 OF 2021
                               IN
           TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 377 OF 2008

 Ashwin Hiraram Ruparel                             ...Applicant
       Versus
 Mr.yatin Hariram Ruparel And Anr.                  ...Respondents

                            ***
 Mr. Omkar Pradhan a/w Avesh Harshan i/by Bose and Mitra and
 Co. for original petitioner No.2 and applicant in
 IA(L)/2376/2022.
 Ms.Khushboo Rupani i/by HSA Advoates for Applicant in
 IA/392/2021.
 Mr. S. C. Naidu a/w Pradeep Kumar and Omkar Kulkarni for
 Petitioner No.1/Applicant in IA(L)/8791/2022.
 Mr. Anoshak Daver a/w Viraj Jadhav for Respondent No.1 in
 IA/392/2021.
                                         ***

                           CORAM     :         N. J. JAMADAR, J.
                           DATE      :         8th AUGUST 2024

 PC.:

1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner No.2.

2. The submissions of Mr. Naidu, the learned Counsel for Petitioner No.1 remained inconclusive.

3. Stand over to 27th August 2024.

D.A.ETHAPE 2 of 3 ::: Uploaded on - 08/08/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 09/08/2024 12:28:15 ::: 14-IA(L)-9968-2022.doc INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 9968 OF 2022

1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2. Mr.Naidu, the learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that as the applicant has relinquished the Administratorship and thereupon by an order dated 5th April 2023, this Court has appointed an Administrator and the Court appointed Administrator has instituted the Suit in the Court at Panvel, the instant application preferred by the applicant seeking permission to sell the property situated at Panvel, does not survive.

3. The order dated 5th April 2023 records that, the Administrators agreed to relinquish and Mr.Anoj Menon, Solicitor came to be appointed to act as an Administrator.

4. In view of the said development, the instant Application does not survive and, accordingly, stands disposed.




                                            (N. J. JAMADAR, J.)




 D.A.ETHAPE                            3 of 3




::: Uploaded on - 08/08/2024                     ::: Downloaded on - 09/08/2024 12:28:15 :::