Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 6]

Patna High Court

Prabhat Shankar Poddar vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 15 April, 2015

Author: V.N. Sinha

Bench: V.N. Sinha

           Patna High Court MJC No.1961 of 2014 dt.15-04-2015




                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

                              Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1961 of 2014
                                                      IN
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 817 of 2007
               ===========================================================
               Prabhat Shankar Poddar, Son of Late Baleshwar Poddar, resident of Chandanbagh,
               Near Bridge, Patna Road, P.S- Kashim Bazar, District- Munger

                                                                          .... .... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
               1.   The State of Bihar, through Sri Rameshwar Singh, Finance Commissioner-
                    Cum- Secretary, now known as Principal Secretary, Finance Department,
                    Government of Bihar, Patna.
               2.   Dr. Shashi Bhushan Pathak, Son of not known, Joint Secretary, Finance
                    Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
               3.   Dr. Kameshwar Ojha Son of not known Under Secretary, Finance Department
                    (Treasury Section), Government of Bihar, Patna.
               4.   Sri Pratap Bhanu Kumar, Son of not known, the Treasury Officer, Munger
                    Treasury, Munger.
               5.   Sri Narendra Kumar Singh, Son of not known, the District Magistrate- Cum-
                    Collector, Munger.

                                                           .... .... Respondent/s
               ===========================================================
               Appearance :
               For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
               For the Respondent/s : Mr.
               ===========================================================
               CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA
               ORAL JUDGMENT

Date: 15-04-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during pendency of this petition order of the writ Court has been complied with, as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the contempt petition, which is, accordingly, disposed of.

(V.N. Sinha, J.) Rajesh/-

U