Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Tapi Irrigation Development ... vs Shri Dashrath Zinga Paradhi And Ors on 5 May, 2026

          1        930-CA.4597-26 (930,931,941,945,949,954,955,958,960).odt




   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
              BENCH AT AURANGABAD

       930 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4597 OF 2026
                  IN FAST/12773/2025
             SHALIK KESHARLAL PARDHI
                        VERSUS
 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR,
                       JALGAON
      WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4795 OF 2025
                 IN FAST/12773/2025

                         AND

       931 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4598 OF 2026
                  IN FAST/11467/2025
             TUKARAM KAUTIK MARATHE
                        VERSUS
 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR,
                       JALGAON
      WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4797 OF 2025
                 IN FAST/11467/2025

                         AND

       941 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5240 OF 2026
                   IN FA/2123/2025
               VITTHAL PITAMBAR PATIL
                        VERSUS
 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR,
                       JALGAON

                         AND

        945 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5274 OF 2026
                   IN FAST/12707/2025
 DANGAL MANSING PATIL DEAD THROUGH L RS INDUBAI
                      DANGAL PATIL
                         VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THECOLLECTOR,
                        JALGAON
      WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4747 OF 2025
                 IN FAST/12707/2025

                         AND
           2        930-CA.4597-26 (930,931,941,945,949,954,955,958,960).odt




      949 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5324 OF 2026
                  IN FA/2125/2025
RAMESH RUJU MARATHE RAMESH RUNZU MARATHE NAME
                AS PER ADHAR CARD
                      VERSUS
     THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

                         AND

       954 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5343 OF 2026
                   IN FA/2075/2025
            MADHUKAR RUNJU MARATHE
                        VERSUS
 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR,
                       JALGAON

                         AND

        955 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5346 OF 2026
                   IN FAST/12699/2025
          TUKARAM DAGA MARATHE AND ANR.
                         VERSUS
TAPI IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, JALGAON
                      AND OTHERS.
      WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4705 OF 2025
                 IN FAST/12699/2025

                         AND

        958 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5351 OF 2026
                   IN FAST/18448/2025
         SUBHASH CHINDHA PATIL AND OTHERS
                         VERSUS
TAPI TRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, JALGAON
      WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8619 OF 2025
                 IN FAST/18448/2025

                         AND

      960 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5353 OF 2026
                 IN FAST/4808/2025
   DASHRATH ZINGA PARADHI DEAD THROUGH L RS
          CHARANBAI DASHRATH PARDHI
                      VERSUS
    THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE
               COLLECTOR, JALGAON
                3            930-CA.4597-26 (930,931,941,945,949,954,955,958,960).odt




        WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12339 OF 2025
                    IN FAST/4808/2025
                               ...
 Advocates for Applicants : Mr. Patil Vijay Bhalerao, Mr. Pande
                       D. D. respectively.
    AGPs for Respondent/s-State : Mr. S. V. Hange. Ms. P. V.
Diggikar, Mr. S. B. Narwade, Mr. G. O. Wattamwar, respectively.
Advocates for Respondent/Acquiring Body : Mr. S. B. Kadu, Mr.
                    A. D. Pawar, respectively.
                               ...

                            CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 05.05.2026 PER COURT :-

1. Heard both sides.
2. Applicants seek to withdraw the amount deposited by the respondent/acquiring body.
3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that entire amount be disbursed. As against that, it is submitted by learned counsels for the acquiring body that this Court has taken consistent view in permitting the claimants to receive 50% of the amount with accrued interest on furnishing undertaking and further 25% of the amount on furnishing solvent surety/security to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.
4 930-CA.4597-26 (930,931,941,945,949,954,955,958,960).odt
4. Civil applications are allowed partly permitting the applicants to receive 50% amount with accrued interest on furnishing undertaking and further 25% on furnishing solvent surety/security to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.
5. Balance amount shall be invested in any nationalize bank, if any.

Civil Applications for Delay

6. Applicants seek to condone delay in preferring first appeals.

7. For the reasons stated in the applications, delay is condoned.

8. Civil applications are allowed.

(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) ...

vmk/-