Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Delhi Development Authority vs Neelam Saluja on 6 May, 2016

Bench: Jagdish Singh Khehar, C. Nagappan

     ITEM NO.45                               COURT NO.3                   SECTION XIV

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F          I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).24104/2012

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/01/2012
     in RFA No.43/1997 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi)

     DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY                                               Petitioner(s)

                                                      VERSUS

     NEELAM SALUJA                                                             Respondent(s)

     (With interim relief and office report)
     (For final disposal)
     WITH SLP(C) No. 35735/2012
     (With Interim Relief and Office Report)

     Date : 06/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN

     For Petitioner(s)                    Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv.
                                          Ms.Nikita Shrivastava, Adv.
                                          Mr.Dhruv Tamta, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)                    Mr.Saurabh Kirpal, Adv.
                                          Mr.Siddharth Thakur, Adv.
                                          Mr. Navin Chawla, Adv.

                                          Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa, Adv.

                         Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                            O R D E R

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that it is not necessary to file rejoinder affidavit. In view of the above, pleadings will be deemed to be complete.

Learned counsel for the parties state that hearing in this matter will take some time.

Signature Not Verified

Post for hearing after four weeks on a day other than Monday and Friday.

Digitally signed by
SATISH KUMAR YADAV
Date: 2016.05.07
12:09:46 TLT
Reason:




         (SATISH KUMAR YADAV)                                                   (RENUKA SADANA)
             AR-CUM-PS                                                            COURT MASTER