Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

State Of Kerala vs P.Renukadevi on 21 November, 2011

Author: K.Vinod Chandran

Bench: K.Vinod Chandran

       

  

  

 
 
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT:

              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

           MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2012/8TH SRAVANA 1934

               RP.No. 666 of 2012 (Y)  IN WPC/2310/2009
                ----------------------------------------


AGAINST THE  JUDGMENT IN WPC.2310/2009 DATED 21-11-2011



REVIEW PETITIONER(S):
--------------------

     1.    STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
           PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
           FINANCE, SECRETARIAT,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

     2.    THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E), KERALA,
           M.G.ROAD, P.B.NO.5607,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

     3.    THE TRANSPORT COMMISIONER, TRANS TOWERS,
           VAZHUTHAKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.


         BY SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SUNIL CYRIAC (FINANCE)



RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

         P.RENUKADEVI, JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER,
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.


         BY ADVS. SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON (SR.)
                  SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR



         THIS REVIEW PETITION     HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION   ON
30-07-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:




amk



                    K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
         ---------------------------------------------------------
         C.M.Appl.No.111/2012 & R.P. No.666/2012
                                     in
                      W.P(C) No.2310/2009
          --------------------------------------------------------
             Dated this the 30th day of July, 2012

                               O R D E R

There is absolutely no satisfactory reason stated in the affidavit accompanying the delay condonation application and the application is only to be dismissed. I do so. In view of the dismissal of the delay condonation petition and in view of Order No.A3/2278/2009/TC dt.25.7.2012 nothing survives in the review petition and hence the review petition is also dismissed.

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE.

okb.