Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Mac Impex vs Msc Beijing ( Imo No 9289099 ) on 1 October, 2018

Author: R.M.Chhaya

Bench: R.M.Chhaya

         C/AS/39/2018                                    ORDER




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                   R/ADMIRALITY SUIT NO. 39 of 2018

==========================================================
                                 MAC IMPEX
                                   Versus
                        MSC BEIJING ( IMO NO 9289099 )
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. JAIMIN R DAVE(7022) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1
MR DHAVAL D VYAS(3225) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA

                               Date : 01/10/2018

                                ORAL ORDER

1. Mr. Dhaval Vyas, learned advocate mentioned the  matter   for   circulation   of   Admiralty   Suit   No.   39   of  2018.

2. Considering the urgency, the suit was ordered to  be listed at 1.30 p.m.

3. Heard   Mr.   Jaimin   Dave,   learned   advocate  appearing   for   the   plaintiff   and   Mr.   Dhaval   Vyas,  learned advocate appearing for the defendant.

4. Mr.   Dhaval   Vyas,   learned   advocate   for   the  defendant states that the Vakalatnama shall be filed  today. Registry shall take the same on record.

5. By   an   order   dated   29.09.2018,   this   Court   has  passed the order of arrest of the defendant.

Page 1 of 3 C/AS/39/2018 ORDER

6. Mr.   Vyas,   learned   advocate   appearing   for   the  defendant   submitted   that   he   has   to   enter   his  appearance in the suit on behalf of the defendant and  defendant is ready and willing to make deposit of the  claim   amount   along   with   interest   till   today   and   on  such   deposit   made   in   the   name   of   the   Registrar   of  this Court, the order of arrest be vacated forthwith.

7. Mr.   Dave,   learned   advocate   appearing   for   the  plaintiff   submitted   that   the   on   deposit   of   full  amount   by   the   defendant,   this   Court   may   pass  appropriate order for vacation of order of arrest.

8. Mr. Vyas, learned advocate for the defendant has  produced photo copy of the two pay orders in the name  of   the   Registrar   of   the   High   Court   of   Gujarat,  Ahmedabad. One pay order is Rs. 7,348,086/­ (Rupees  Seven   million   three   hundred   forty   eight   thousand  eighty   six   only)   and   another   pay   order   is   Rs.  11,222/­   (Rupees   Eleven  thousand   two   hundred   twenty  two only). 

9. Registry   is   hereby   directed   to   accept   both   the  aforesaid pay orders and on same being deposited, the  order of arrest dated 29.09.2018 stands vacated.

10. On   deposit   being   made   as   above,   the   order   of  arrest   dated   29.09.2018   shall   stand   vacated.   The  defendant is at liberty to inform about this order by  Fax or E­mail on its own cost.

Page 2 of 3 C/AS/39/2018 ORDER

11. The   amount   deposited   shall   be   invested   in   a  Nationalized Bank as per the practice.

12. The deposit of the aforesaid amount as security  is without prejudice and rights of all the parties.

Direct service today is permitted.

(R.M.CHHAYA, J) SALIM/ Page 3 of 3