Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Sanjay Chouhan vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 29 April, 2025

Author: K. Sreenivasa Reddy

Bench: K. Sreenivasa Reddy

     THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY

                 Criminal Petition No.3831 of 2025

Order:

       This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the

petitioner/Accused, seeking anticipatory bail, in Crime No.470 of

2024 of Tirupathi East Police Station, Tirupathi district,

registered for the offences punishable under Sections 274, 275,

316(5), 318(3), 318(4), 61(2), 299 read with 49 read with 3(5) of

the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 51 and 59 of

the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

2.     Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, this is a case of

cheating, criminal breach of trust by a merchant, causing

wrongful loss to TTD with a dishonest and common intention to

supply adulterated and substandard Cow Ghee deviating the

conditions of tender agreement between M/s. AR Dairy Food

Private Limited, Dindigal, Tamilnadu and the TTD authorities by

conspiring with some TTD officials having vested interests and

abetting them with criminal conspiracy and ill intention to

deliberately hurt religious sentiments of the Hindu devotees of

Lord     Sri   Venkateswara   Swamy,     Tirumala    by   supplying
                                2


adulterated Ghee to TTD, that occurred prior to 12.07.2024 at

TTD Administration building, Tirupati and reported in the East

Police Station, Tirupati on 25.09.2024 at 01.45 PM, by the

informant, who is the General Manager (Procurement), TTD,

Tirupati.

3.    It is alleged in the report that the TTD called for tenders

for supply of 10 lakh KGs of Cow Ghee with Agmark special

grade on 12.03.2024. The tender was finalized on 08.05.2024

and supply order was issued on 15.05.2024 to M/s. AR Dairy

Food Private Limited, Dindigal, Tamilnadu and they supplied

four tankers on 12.06.2024, 20.06.2024, 25.06.2024 and

04.07.2024

respectively. The samples of the Ghee was sent to NDDB CALF Lab, Anand, Gujarat State for adulteration testing confidentially and lab report dated 12.07.2024 was issued stating that the Ghee supplied by M/s. AR Dairy Food Private Limited, Dindigal is substandard and adulterated Ghee and that all the samples have vegetable and animal fat based adulterants including LARD.

4. Further case of the prosecution is that the Directors of Bhole Baba Dairy, Sri Vyshnavi Dairy and AR Dairy conspired together and in furtherance of the criminal conspiracy, they 3 created false and fabricated documents and submitted the same to TTD with a dishonest intention to get tender in favour of M/s. AR Dairy and in furtherance of said conspiracy, on receipt of Ghee from Bhole Baba to Vyshnavi Dairy, supplied the same to TTD through AR Dairy, which is substandard and adulterated with vegetable fats and animals fats as per the NDDB CALF test reports.

5. Heard. Perused the record.

6. A perusal of the material on record goes to show that basing on the report of the General Manager (Procurement), TTD, Tirupati, the present crime has been registered against M/s. AR Dairy Foods Private Limited, Dindigul and others. The Directors of M/s. Bhole Baba Organic Dairy Private Limited, Bhagwanpur, Roorke, Uttarakhand are arrayed as A3 and A4 in the present crime and the petitioner herein is working as a Machine Operator in the said M/s. Bhole Baba Organic Dairy Private Limited. The accusations attributed against the petitioner herein and others are very serious in nature. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the investigation is at nascent stage and some more witnesses are to be examined and at this stage if the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail he 4 may hamper the investigation and tamper with the prosecution witnesses. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner herein.

7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition, shall stand closed.

_______________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J Dated:29.04.2025 Nsr 5 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Criminal Petition No.3831 of 2025 Dated:29.04.2025 Nsr