Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Shravanakumar S/O Shivanna Wali vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 July, 2010

Bench: N.K.Patil, A.S.Bopanna

IN TI£E HIGH comm' or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 7%! DAY OF JULY, 203.5; j

: PRESENT :

THE I-IOIVPBLE MR. JUSIICE     4

THE HON'BLE MR. l1l1rsj:IcVE~_A".s,   .
W.P. No. 5732  
Between:    l 2 H H

Shravanakurnar,_.. ._ _ _ = .

S/o.ShiV:a'nna Wall,    

Aged Abot;:»'3V4 Yeafs,"V '   

Oco;-Ciéis_s11v-{3Vontra_etor,   '

R/ov. _Na;t_ogun, " '   

VVPost_AN"a_rou'i::1;_.  ~ V

Tq:A3.and;, ' T "

Dist:Gulbarga;
* "  Petitioner

(By Sri. G. GA, .chaga{sh;§tt2..8: Sti. iifé. Biradar, Advocates)

I

 

Rep,  its' S'ecr6t?5Y.
Depa.17trnen_t_of Mines and Geology,

V V' _M.S. Building; 

,< l  _ .2 Bangalore» 1:.

"  ¢om;n£r~oller,
Kamataka Veterinary Animal and Fishery.

1':  ___ " 'Science College,
T _' 'N.a.ndi Nagar,



Dist:Bidar.

. .. Respondents

(By Sri. R. G. Kolie, AGA for R1;

Notice to R2 dispensed with V/() dated 7.7.2010} This WP. is filed under Articles 226 & 227__ of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the respond-en'ts not to deduct royalty from the bills of the petitioner _and"~not to insist him to produce the royalty paid recei_pts'»byl- '_the~1r Vendors and also to direct the respondentsto rer~.:;mi royalty already deducted from the bills of the petitioner. This W.P. coming on for orders,' this d;ay,:"l¥1.I§.I52X'I;IL J ., made the following: z :0 R5D The petitioner in this-petition--- f'sot;ght for all direction, directing . the respondieéntsi'-not to deduct royalty fromVii'hi"S also" not.._"to'Vinsist him to produce the royalty_pai_d re¢ei,é5rstVby_:'tll§i;:. Vendors. Further petitioner has sought to"--«.,direct-_ 'respondents to refund the royalty V. alvieadyptydeducteldfrom the bills of the petitioner. heard learned counsel for the petlitioner' learned Additional Government Advocate .. tfor respondent.

tsnf V as the royalty within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(ii) The respondent Nos. 1 and directed to receive the same _ appropriate orders in accordance "

in the light of the Court in similar matters theyd same, expeditiously. Sd/A...' Sd/-3 REESE