Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 14]

Bombay High Court

Sanjeet R. Shukla vs The State Of Maharashtra And Prashant ... on 19 December, 2018

Author: M. S. Karnik

Bench: Naresh H. Patil, M. S. Karnik

                                                     1/2

                                                                               chswl-526-18.doc
 pdp
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

               CHAMBER SUMMONS LODGING NO. 526 OF 2018
                                 WITH
                 WRIT PETITION LODGING NO. 4100 OF 2018

 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Office      Notes,       Office
  Memoranda of appearances,                                Court's or Judge's orders
  Court's orders or directions &
  Registrar's orders.


                     Mr. Abhijit Patil for applicant/intervener.
                     Mr. Pradeep Sancheti, Sr. Adv. A/w Darshit Jain, Kanchan
                     Dube and Neha Yadav I/by Ashish U. Mishra for original
                     petitioner.

                     Mr. V. A. Thorat, Senior Counsel, Mr. A. A. Kumbhakoni,
                     Advocate General, Mr. A. Y. Sakhare, Senior Counsel, Mr. A.
                     B. Vagyani, Govt. Pleader, Smt. P. H. Kantharia, GP, Smt. G.
                     R. Shastri, Addl. G.P, Mr. P. P. Kakade, AGP, Ms. Nisha
                     Mehra, AGP, Mr. Vaibhav Sugdare, Ms. Prachi Tatake, Mr.
                     Akshay Shinde, B Panel AGP and Joel Carlos, Shriram
                     Pingle for Respondent-State.


                            CORAM :           NARESH H. PATIL, CJ. &
                                              M. S. KARNIK, J.

DECEMBER 19, 2018. P.C. :

1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant ::: Uploaded on - 21/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 25/12/2018 21:23:11 ::: 2/2 chswl-526-18.doc
-intervener submits that the applicant is supporting the subject legislation and opposing the writ petition.
3. Mr. Sancheti, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he has no objection for allowing the Chamber Summons.
4. The applicants/intervener undertakes to supply copy of the Chamber Summons on the petitioner.
5. Chamber Summons for intervention is allowed. The petitioner to add the applicant as party-respondent to the Writ Petition and serve copy of the petition on the said applicant.
                               M. S. KARNIK,J.                         CHIEF JUSTICE




::: Uploaded on - 21/12/2018                           ::: Downloaded on - 25/12/2018 21:23:11 :::