Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Leucine Rich Bio Private Limited vs The Registrar Of Trade Marks on 31 October, 2023

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                    DATED: 31.10.2023
                                                         CORAM
                        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
                                                (T)CMA(TM)/170/2023
                                              (OA/SR.72/2019/TM/CHN)


                     Leucine Rich Bio Private Limited,
                     Trading as Leucine Rich Bio
                     Private Limited (Body Incorporate)
                     679/57, 30th Cross, Jayanagar 4th T.Block,
                     Bangalore 560 041.                                            ... Appellant
                                                     -vs-

                     The Registrar of Trade Marks,
                     Trade Marks Registry at Chennai,
                     GST Road, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.                          ... Respondent

                     PRAYER:         Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (Trade Marks) is
                     filed under Section 91(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, praying to set
                     aside the order dated 23rd April 2019 by the Registrar of Trade
                     Marks, Chennai in Application No.3260362 in Class 42; to direct the
                     trade        mark   Registry   to   proceed   with   the   acceptance   and
                     advertisement of the mark in the Trade Mark Journal; and thereby
                     render justice.




                     1/2


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                        SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J

                                                                                              rna

                                       For Appellant      : No Appearance
                                       For Respondent     : Mr.A.R.Sakthivel, SPC
                                                          **********
                                                        JUDGMENT

The bailiff's report dated 29.09.2023 records that the appellant left the address specified in the cause title of the petition. Therefore, learned counsel for the Registrar of Trade Marks was directed to ascertain whether a change of address was communicated by the appellant to the Trade Marks Registry. Learned counsel reported that no change of address was communicated. The matter is listed today under the caption "for dismissal" under the above facts and circumstances. In the absence of a current address for service, the appeal cannot be proceeded with.

2. Therefore, (T)CMA(TM)/170/2023 is dismissed for non- prosecution without any order as to costs.

31.10.2023 rna Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation: Yes / No (T)CMA(TM)/170/2023 (OA/SR.72/2019/TM/CHN) 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis