Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

489C Of The Indian Penal Code vs In Re : Manick Biswas @ Manik on 22 August, 2023

22.08.2023
  32
 sdas
rejected


                                   C.R.M.(DB) No. 3278 of 2023

             In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of
             Criminal Procedure in connection with Bhimpur Police Station
             Case No. 80 of 2023 dated 16.03.2023 under Sections 489B and
             489C of the Indian Penal Code.
                                                And
             In Re : Manick Biswas @ Manik              .... petitioner


                           Ms. Roma Roy
                                              ....for the petitioner

                           Mr. Binay Panda
                           Ms. Puspita Saha
                                              ...... for the State



                     1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits alleged FICNs had been planted and he has been falsely implicated. He prays for bail.

2. Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits FICNs valued at Rs.15,000/- were recovered from the petitioner.

3. We have considered the materials on record. Initially a large volume of FICNs were recovered from the co-accused. In the course of investigation petitioner was arrested and FICNs valued at Rs.15,000/- were recovered. No FICN was recovered from the co- accused who is on bail. Petitioner cannot claim parity with the said co-accused. In view of the prima facie materials on record and considering the possibility of similar offence occurring in future if 2 the petitioner is released on bail we are not inclined to grant bail to him.

4. The application for bail is, thus, rejected. (Rai Chattopadhyay, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)