Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Religare Finvest Limited vs Widescreen Holdings Private Limited & ... on 5 February, 2019

Author: Rajiv Shakdher

Bench: Rajiv Shakdher

$~8 to 11
*     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+     O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 274/2018
      RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED                    ..... Petitioner
                     Through     Mr. Sanjeev Singh and Ms. Anandita
                                 Singh, Advs.
                     versus
      WIDESCREEN HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
                                                      ..... Respondents
                     Through     Mr. Aman Raj Gandhi, Mr. Abhirath
                                 Thakur and Mr. Yash, Advs.
AND
+     O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 276/2018
        RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED                ..... Petitioner
                      Through  Mr. Sanjeev Singh and Ms. Anandita
                               Singh, Advs.
                      versus
        ASIAN SATELLITE BROADCAST PVT. LTD. & ORS.
                                                    ..... Respondents
                      Through  Mr. Aman Raj Gandhi, Mr. Abhirath
                               Thakur and Mr. Yash, Advs.
AND
+   O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 277/2018
    RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED                    ..... Petitioner
                   Through     Mr. Sanjeev Singh and Ms. Anandita
                               Singh, Advs.
                   versus
    EDISONS INFRAPOWER AND MULTIVENTURES PRIVATE
    LIMITED & ANR.                              ..... Respondents
                   Through     Mr. Aman Raj Gandhi, Mr. Abhirath
                               Thakur and Mr. Yash, Advs.
AND
+   O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 279/2018
    RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED                    ..... Petitioner
                   Through     Mr. Sanjeev Singh and Ms. Anandita
                               Singh, Advs.
                   versus
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 274/2018                                 Page 1 of 2
         KONTI INFRAPOWER AND MULTIVENTURES PRIVATE
        LIMITED & ORS.                       ..... Respondents
                       Through    Mr. Aman Raj Gandhi, Mr. Abhirath
                                  Thakur and Mr. Yash, Advs.
        CORAM:
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
                       ORDER

% 05.02.2019 I.A. 17071/2018 in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 274/2018 I.A. 17072/2018 in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 276/2018 I.A. 17070/2018 in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 277/2018 I.A. 17073/2018 in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 279/2018

1. These are the applications for condonation of delay in filing the rejoinder.

2. The period of delay involved is identical i.e., 132 days.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents says that he does not oppose the prayer made in the applications.

4. The delay is condoned.

5. The applications are, accordingly, disposed of. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 274/2018, O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 276/2018, O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 277/2018 & O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 279/2018

6. At request of counsel for the parties, renotify the matters on 9.5.2019.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J FEBRUARY 05, 2019 rb O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 274/2018 Page 2 of 2