Karnataka High Court
Ramachandra vs Sunanda Prakash Kokane on 26 May, 2008
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda
Bench: A.N.Venugopala Gowda
IN THE HIGH coum or KARNATAKA AT BANGALoRE [
DATED THIS THE 26*" DAY OF MAY, 2003- '
serene
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. vsuusor-§AL;A gowsé 7
WRIT PETITION No.17s4;:1%;t2oos'(me-CP~:.fi)%
BETWEEN: %% '
1 sm. RAMACHANQRA
s/ovAsus:>EvaH1se .
AGED ABOUT 8D_YEAR$,...__'=. ' '
ago uo.1212,.sAaA:=e3AL,ug
SHAHPiJR.E_EL(i;iAUM. f
pm com-2 «2;9aMee1'%% %
2 SR1.
S/O:VASUt3E§.~'_VBH£SE % %
AGEQ AacuT'?4«yE;aRs%,T 'I % %
R/0 N<>.1212,%sARfAFGAm%
SHAHPUR, BELGAUM' .
PIN CODE590 om, '
SRIPAB ' % %%%%%
. sic VASUQEV BHISE
~ 'r1'.GEE}_A%3(}uT 72 YEARS,
' R10 zvAo.,_1212., SARAF <5Au_I
- ASHAHPUfR,._ BELGAUM
ma cane 590 om
M sax; réwanuma
x 5/0 vnsuaev BHISE
.V AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
'ago No.1212, SARAF mm
; SHAfiPUR, BELGAUM
PIN com: 590 001
~ 55 Sm. SARASWATI @ SARU
D/O VASUDEV BHISE
Him, om KOKANE
-4 r-£34253, 'sHUéAnGI 9/0 PRAKASH KOKANE
k _ %%'(3$k sax R com, ADV. FOR R1-4)
V' AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH
AGED ABOUT so YEARS,
R/O 1s:o.1212, SARAF GALLI
smnwa, BELGAUM M A
PIN cone 590 001 . 4; x
psmzomzs = ' - * '
(av sax M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADV. FOR-SRI--..\{ V'
AND: _ . .
1 SMT. SUNANDA PRAKAsHT:<0KA.'-W
W/0 PRAKASH KOKANE -- _ i
MAJOR. " 1 ..
R/G GURUWARPETH, inmxwmr ..
BELGAUMH . . u
PIN com: 590 636-,
2 MS.S--'JVATHi,
D/o:VPRAKAs+:%.Ko;<Are§
man, A - %
R/O GiiRUWAR?ETH,. m;xmAo1
BELGAUH ~ V 1 _
PIN. CODE:-«5900.£=-6
% M}'-'JO"i2f M
A WXO'MIfi!l)'REE----.CONSULTING, No.42
~27THv.CRQS$',..BANASHANKARI II STAGE
'- .MINDTREE--- VILLAGE, BANGALORE 560070
MA1€>:2,i-
" 'A we NO.185, MATHILA APARTMENT
« '_ . GURUWARPE111, TILAKWADI 590 006
BELGAUM
: RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 ANNEXUREG ORDER DATED 3.1.2003 PASSED IN BELGAUM.
r=.D.P.No.36/1988 BY THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE m.ptn.;or; This petition coming on for preliminary in u 2 group this day, the Court made the fcvilovviragr; 2' . 0 R 0 ER Sri M.S.Harish Kumar, petitioners submits that tht~:~..oropérty.'Vir§ r':{isput«at,t fihioh was tfe subject matter of FDP 36,1998 the of the trial Court, has ggjttioners and the respondents to on -that View of the matter, th»a"iitigr{t£:onA:h§§s's in View of which, there is to tvrit petition.
Pi;;ci'ng thé"»snbrni$ééon of the teamed counsel on dismissed as not surviving for con*sid«erativo'n., - V .
Sd/-3 Igdfi