Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

V.L.Benin Deva Kumar vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 22 August, 2024

Author: Abdul Quddhose

Bench: Abdul Quddhose

                                                                     W.P.(MD)No.19138 of 2015




                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                             DATED: 22.08.2024

                                                  CORAM

                                  THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                         W.P.(MD)No.19138 of 2015
                                                    and
                                         W.M.P.(MD)No.2241 of 2016


                    1.V.L.Benin Deva Kumar
                    2.C.Senthil
                    3.G.B.Jayachitra
                    4.V.L.Sam Prince Kumar
                    5.K.Soman Nair
                    6.R.Anross
                    7.R.Soundararajan
                    8.G.Saravanan
                    9.S.Berlin Christopher
                    10.D.Rajan
                    11.C.Moorthy
                    12.R.Ashok Kumar
                    13.S.George Benet                                  : Petitioners
                                                    Vs.

                    1.State of Tamil Nadu,
                       Rep by the Secretary to Government,
                       Education Department,
                       Secretariat,
                       Chennai – 9.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                    1/7
                                                          W.P.(MD)No.19138 of 2015

                    2.The Director of School Education,
                       College Road,
                       Chennai – 6.


                    3.The Chief Educational Officer,
                       Tirunelveli District,
                       Tirunelveli.


                    4.The Chief Educational Officer,
                       Kanyakumari District,
                       Kanyakumari.


                    5.S.Paulraj
                    6.S.Arulraj
                    7.P.Vijayagowri
                    8.R.Nagarathnam
                    9.P.Tamilselvi
                    10.S.Swaminathan
                    11.C.Jayaraman
                    12.S.Balasubramanian
                    13.K.Balasubramanian
                    14.T.Saraswathi
                    15.P.Vadivelu
                    16.K.Manimekalai
                    17.K.Chennappan
                    18.T.Mohanram
                    19.S.Meenakshi Sundaram
                    20.K.Sekar
                    21.R.Elumalai
                    22.V.Sundaram
                    23.S.Prabakaran
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                    2/7
                                                                       W.P.(MD)No.19138 of 2015

                    24.M.Nagalingam
                    25.V.Gunasekaran
                    26.S.Annamalai
                    27.L.Durai                                            : Respondents


                    [R5 to R16 are impleaded vide court order dated 29.01.2016 in
                    W.M.P.(MD)Nos.1359 & 1700 of 2016].
                    [R17 to R26 are impleaded vide court order dated 29.11.2022 in
                    W.M.P.(MD)No.1004 of 2016].
                    [R27 is impleaded vide court order dated 29.11.2022 in W.M.P.
                    (MD)No.3100 of 2022].


                    PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

                    India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the

                    records on the file of the second respondent related to the seniority

                    list drawn as on 01.01.2019 produced along with the Director's

                    Letter addressed to Special Government Pleader dated 11.12.2020

                    on 15.12.2020 and quash the same and direct the respondent to

                    notify the seniority list of B.T.Assistant (Promotees) and the directly

                    recruited consolidated pay B.T.Assistant between 2002-2006 and

                    2011-2014 by following the ratio of 50-50 fixed between the Direct

                    Recruits and the promotees before effecting further promotion to the

                    post of Headmaster / Headmistress or P.G.Assistant.

                    [Prayer amended vide court order dated 29.11.2022
                    in W.M.P.(MD)No.3101 of 2022].




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                    3/7
                                                                                 W.P.(MD)No.19138 of 2015



                                    For Petitioners               : Mr.D.Selvanayagam
                                    For Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr.T.Amjad Khan
                                                                   Government Advocate


                                                       ORDER

When the Writ Petition was taken up for hearing, learned Counsel for the petitioners on instructions would submit that though the petitioners have challenged the impugned seniority list, the petitioners will be satisfied if they are allowed to give a representation to the second respondent to fix the ratio of 50:50 fixed between the direct recruits and the promotees, before effecting further promotion to the post of Head Master / Head Mistress or P.G. Assistants and a direction is issued to the second respondent to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law.

2.Learned Counsel appearing for the respective private respondents even though raised objections with regard to the relief sought for by the petitioners, they have not raised any serious objection if the representation of the petitioners is directed to be considered on merits and in accordance with law, after taking into consideration the interest of all the stake holders.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/7 W.P.(MD)No.19138 of 2015

3.Accordingly, this Court grants liberty to the petitioners to submit a fresh representation to the second respondent seeking for a relief as sought for in this writ petition within a period of two [2] weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the said representation, the second respondent shall pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve [12] weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4.With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                        22.08.2024

                    Index           :Yes / No
                    Internet        : Yes / No
                    NCC             : Yes/No
                    MR




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/7 W.P.(MD)No.19138 of 2015 To

1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai – 6.

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

4.The Chief Educational Officer, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 6/7 W.P.(MD)No.19138 of 2015 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

MR W.P.(MD)No.19138 of 2015 22.08.2024 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 7/7