Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Karnataka High Court

The Manager Legal Royal Sundaram ... vs Smt. Nirmala W/O Siddappa Bhutanal & Ors on 9 December, 2015

Bench: A.S.Bopanna, G.Narendar

                          -1-



        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
               KALABURAGI BENCH

     DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015

                       PRESENT

        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.BOPANNA

                          AND

        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR

            M.F.A. No. 200837/2015 (MV)


BETWEEN:
THE MANAGER LEGAL,
ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INS.
CO. LTD, LINGAD ROAD,
Dr. SAJJAN HOSPITAL,
BIJAPUR.

                                      ...APPELLANT

(BY SRI. C. S. KALABURAGI, ADV.)


AND:

1.   SMT.F NIRMALA
     W/O SIDDAPPA BHUTANAL
     AGE: 47 YEARS,
     OCC: HOUSE WORK
     R/O HAKIM CHOWK,
     BIJAPUR.


2.   PRASAD
     S/O SIDDAPPA BHUTANAL
     AGE: 20 YEARS,
                          -2-



     OCC: STUDENT
     R/O HAKIM CHOWK,
     BIJAPUR.

3.   RAGHU @ RAGHAVENDRA
     S/O SIDDAPPA BHUTANAL
     AGE: 16 YEARS
     OCC:STUDENT
     SINCE PETITIONER NO.3 IS MINOR
     R/O BY HIS NEXT FRIEND/NATURAL MOTHER
     PETITION NO.1 SMT. NIRMALA
     W/O SIDDAPPA BHUTANAL
     AGE: 47 YEARS,
     R/O HAKIM CHOWK,
     BIJAPUR.

4.   SRI. MANIS S/O SELVARAJ
     AGE: 42 YEARS,
     OCC: BUSINESS
     R/O AMMAN KATTUR,
     MORASAPATTY POST,
     EDAPPADY TK, SALEM,
     STATE TAMILNADU- 636 009.

                                     ...RESPONDENTS



      THIS M.F.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173 (1) OF MV
ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED
22.11.2014 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND MOTOR ACCIDENT CLALIMS TRIBUNAL NO.V,
BIJAPUR IN MVC NO.44/2013, INCLUDING THE COST OF
THIS APPEAL AND ETC.


      THIS M.F.A COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
A.S. BOPANNA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                             -3-



                        JUDGMENT

The order dated 26.09.2015 has already taken effect since the objections had not been complied. In that view, the appeal stands dismissed.

Liberty is however reserved to the learned counsel for the appellant to comply with the office objections within two weeks. If such compliance is made, leave is granted to file appropriate application for recall.

Sd/-

JUDGE Sd/-

JUDGE hrp ct-rj