Johnson Alexander vs State By Cbi Acb R.T. Nagar on 3 July, 2009

[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Karnataka High Court

Johnson Alexander vs State By Cbi Acb R.T. Nagar on 3 July, 2009

Bench: Subhash B.Adi

gsmmmm ¢--~:e€_.w"%cm;.2ra?w cm mmgaimm mm ms.

n.v~«gmsua';rwv.+*=-'aR'\.II"' muww \.mm<.r, L.N- IKAWNAEAKA HEGH (SOUR? 0? KARMAVAKA HEQH KQURY' Q?" RA

B3' TEE; mam cmm' SF' manamxm 9:1' BA.RGAI..ORE
game ms am am my arr my 2999 
EEFSRE    

mm I-IC}N*ELE hm. .1z.3s*r1cE   g  

mama PE'I'ITIOH N(3§4.2:§-i€3.T';'$ 0®  f V   « - 7

EETWEEH:

JaF£mGNALEm1~a'EER
S[OJ.ALEXAI€DE'ﬁ~._ 

mm mam 33 m%«;RB%   
R;.r;*1'1i:),5o7§s:.1mTrema-,--VV"  
 :m93TA::m_   
BAHGAIQRE33 %    ...PE'TI'I"I€)HER

(BYE! 3  ﬂaws)

mm:  %%%%  _ >
STATE B¥cB:%w.Vj"   %  
£613 RT. Raazw   

aAz¢G:aLt:~RE; % 2 A  xmmzsmzm

 €nR{,.P ﬁ'"'°§ '§.ED 2:33.432 cans E1' TEE

%%'L%;égwf:m;.aér;*::% mg mg mrrrmnma ZFRAYIHG warm? mm
'EI{?H?_B"LE-.;cCIU§E€'1".. my Em mmsm 're qzmsn mm

Eiwruzzsz r-Rczgcwﬁﬁmas IR swam s::.mm.115 011* 2991
oﬂma _1?*ti;z:3ATo1w mm Xiﬂ 1mm. cm CEIIL gum

 V %V _SESa§{>H£§AJt3ﬁﬁE mm SPECIAL James 902 «:23: mass,
  %   

  ?ET?I'i'.$ﬁ ﬁﬂﬁﬁﬁﬁ ﬂﬁ FQR ﬁﬂﬁﬂﬁﬁiﬁﬁ Tmﬁ

'ffiﬁ caum mus Tw mLmm1m~:..



ya w-umwmmnm. amwn uuum us" mmswmnnrwm Hymn uwumx Mr" M»%aMW.§&:a%'um& §"'§%£;§§"§ QQQW? OF K&.W%Eﬁ%"?ﬁa%{A H§GH Q3335

    §ca:mi.1:hed mr he is iumzm in: the allqad 0553:1122 and

ORDER

The peﬁﬁonw has sazughx for in C.C.Ke.115;'2€X31 new ﬁle: er the Sspechl Judge. cm: A aﬁﬁ 1: the pe:tit1on' an Based ' 1: J the cB1pouee,1earma Mg g§:?:¢'fate. k' am far the aﬁezace IPC 11' w.

Swim' n 1342) rfw. sm 13g%1jAg1s;%@ Preven1:ion cf Senior Ceumel for the %mag, the petitioner had dmlt with awordanrze vmth' the prawns' ions 95' ﬁmaohmxi in the aﬁmm, 110:!' the mg the ca: poﬁce discloses The V He furthm' submit' bad that mkam' £5 also barred ufs.-iiﬁﬁ IPC and auwittxad m aﬁmm has hm:

ftzrmaubnxﬂﬁtlrxathisnamhaaheenfalsely; i1npIi::a*ba:iinthea1J@aﬁ'af1ce,%swyanthe

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

Karnataka High Court