Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Kamalkishor Shrigopal Taparia vs India Ener Gen Private Limited on 28 August, 2020

Bench: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose

     ITEM NO.13                    Court 7 (Video Conferencing)                        SECTION II-A

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F              I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 8968/2020

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06-08-2019
     in CRLA Nos.116/2019, 21/2019, 22/2019 and 255/2019 passed by the
     High Court of Judicature at Bombay)

     KAMALKISHOR SHRIGOPAL TAPARIA                                                 Petitioner(s)

                                                           VERSUS

     INDIA ENER GEN PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.                                         Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.60714/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY
     IN FILING and IA No.60715/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE
     IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

     Date : 28-08-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE

     For Petitioner(s)                  Mr.   Neeraj Kumar Jain,Sr.Adv.
                                        Mr.   Sanjeet Vats,Adv.
                                        Mr.   Umang Shankar, AOR
                                        Mr.   Aniket Jain,Adv.

     For Respondent(s)


                           UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                            O R D E R

Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment is allowed.

Delay condoned.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner contends that even as per paragraph 14 of the impugned order, the status of the Signature Not Verified petitioner was of a Director and it is his contention that he is Digitally signed by ASHA SUNDRIYAL Date: 2020.08.28 19:26:46 IST Reason: independent Director and the legal position is not that all 1 Directors have to be roped in. It is his submission that he is neither the Managing Director nor a signatory to the cheque. Issue notice.

In the meantime, the proceedings qua the petitioner alone shall remain stayed.




    (CHARANJEET KAUR)                                  (ANITA RANI AHUJA)
       AR-CUM-PS                                      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR




                                     2