Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Budhpur Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. vs Abhay Narayan Manudhane on 25 July, 2022

Bench: Indira Banerjee, V. Ramasubramanian

                                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                         CIVIL APPEAL No. 4895 OF 2022


      BUDHPUR BUILDCON PVT. LTD.                                            ...APPELLANT (S)

                                                      VERSUS

      ABHAY NARAYAN MANUDHANE                                             …RESPONDENT (S)



                                                     ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is against an order dated 19 th July 2022 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT).

By the aforesaid order, the NCLAT concluded the hearing before it and reserved the judgment. The judgment is yet to be delivered.

Considering that an interim order which was in operation till August, 2021 stood vacated, the NCLAT clarified that at the time of conclusion of the final hearing, there was no interim order. Learned Counsel were given liberty to file written notes of submissions within a week from 19th July 2022. The time to file written submissions has not expired as yet.

We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order whereby the appeal filed by the Appellant has only been reserved for judgment. Our attention has been drawn to an interim order dated 22 nd March 2022 passed by Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ARORA the NCLAT in I.A. No.753 of 2022 filed by the Appellant, whereby the NCLAT GULSHAN KUMAR Date: 2022.08.10 16:58:08 IST Reason: directed the Respondent to defer discussion and decision on Revised Resolution 1 Plans till the next date of hearing and further advanced the date of hearing to 28th March 2022. Thereafter the Company Appeal along with I.A. No.753 of 2022 was listed for hearing before the NCLAT on 28th March 2022, 8th April 2022 and 9th May 2022 but could not be taken on each of those occasions due to paucity of time. On each occasion Counsel for the Appellant mentioned the Company Appeal and made a request for extension of the interim order dated 22nd March 2022, to which there was no objection from the Respondent. It is submitted that the request for extension of interim order was allowed on each occasion, but no formal order was recorded. We are informed that no decision has yet been taken on the Revised Resolution Plans. A meeting of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) is scheduled to be held today.

We direct that the meeting of the CoC may go on but no resolution shall be taken and, if already taken, there should be no voting on the resolution, till disposal of the appeal by the NCLAT.

We request the NCLAT to dispose of the appeal as early as possible. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.

…………………………………………J. [Indira Banerjee] ………………………………………….J. [V. Ramasubramanian] New Delhi;

July 25, 2022




                                                                                2
ITEM NO.44                    COURT NO.7                     SECTION XVII

                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F          I N D I A
                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                      Civil Appeal    No(s).     4895/2022

BUDHPUR BUILDCON PVT. LTD.                                    Appellant(s)

                                      VERSUS

ABHAY NARAYAN MANUDHANE                                       Respondent(s)

(IA No.101274/2022-GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF and IA No.101275/2022- EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.101276/2022-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES ) Date : 25-07-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN For Appellant(s) Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Aman Raj Gandhi, AOR Mr. Pranaya Goyal, Adv.

Mr. Nitesh Ranawat, Adv.

Ms. Disha Shetty, Adv.

Ms. Apoorva Kaushik, Adv.

Mr. Chiranjivi Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Amit Bihari, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Sr. Adv.

Ms. Meghna Rao, Adv.

Mr. Manish Kumar Gupta, Adv.

Mr. Deepayan Mandal, Adv.

Mr. Shubhro Sanyal, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order. We direct that the meeting of the CoC may go on but no resolution shall be taken and, if already taken, there should be no voting on the resolution, till disposal of the appeal by the NCLAT. 3 We request the NCLAT to dispose of the appeal as early as possible.

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly.




(GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA)                          (MATHEW ABRAHAM)
     AR-CUM-PS                                 COURT MASTER (NSH)

               (Signed order is placed on the file)




                                                                    4