Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

T A Khaja Hussain vs C Irshad Basha Nizami on 19 July, 2021

          HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AT AMARAVATI

  MAIN CASE: SECOND APPEAL No.234 of 2021

                                  PROCEEDING SHEET

  Sl.     Date                              ORDER                              OFFICE
  No.                                                                           NOTE

   4.   19.7.2021   MVR,J
                              Second Appeal No.234 of 2021

                          Heard Sri Srinivasa Rao Pappu, learned
                    counsel for the appellant. Considering the decrees
                    and judgments of the trial Court as well as the first




                                    ll
                               riraia
                    appellate Court since the following substantial
                    questions of law arise for determination in this
                    second appeal, Admit:


                         cmom TT
                          1. Whether the lower appellate Court erred in not
                             considering the additional evidence placed
                             before it and erroneously denied opportunity to
                   cee.c.o 77
                             the plaintiffs to place all their contentions
                             during pendency of the appeal by allowing
                             them by making necessary amendment to their
               aannc ee!!

                             pleadings in view of the ignorance as
                             contended by the plaintiffs?
            nuu t t
      www.n. eeaa


                          2. Whether Ex.B.1 Settlement deed which was
                             construed as Will but not as Settlement deed
                             by the lower Court can be negative by the
                             lower appellate Court without there being any
   www Crr




                             cross-objections etc., by the plaintiffs-
    FF C




                             respondents?

Issue notice to the respondents to submit arguments in respect of the above substantial questions of law (Arulmighu Nellukadai Mariamman PPDD Tirukkoil vs. Tamilarasi (dead) by LRs., Air 2019 SC 3027 followed).

List during the 1st week of October 2021.

________ MVR,J I.A.No.4 of 2021 Heard.

Interim stay of operation of decree in O.S. No.159 of 2005 on the file of the Court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Amalapuram, dated 04.12.2010, as confirmed in A.S. No.3 of 2011 dated 05.1.2019 on the file of the Court of learned Contd...., II Additional District Judge, East Godavari at Amalapuram, until further orders, subject to the appellants depositing the costs awarded by the Courts below, within four weeks from now, and notice.

________ MVR,J I.A.No.3 of 2021 Heard. Since certified copies of the decree and judgment of the trial Court were filed, this petition is closed.

ll riraia ________ MVR,J vasu cmom TT cee.c.o 77 aannc ee!! nuu t t www.n. eeaa www Crr FF C PPDD