Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 14]

Calcutta High Court

M/S. Bhusa Exports Ltd vs The Income Tax Officer [Tds] Ward 57[2] ... on 6 May, 2011

Author: Bhaskar Bhattacharya

Bench: Bhaskar Bhattacharya

                              GA No. 1319 of 2011
                              ITAT No. 118 of 2011

                        IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

                         Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax]

                                 ORIGINAL SIDE


                          M/S. BHUSA EXPORTS LTD.

                                      Versus

            THE INCOME TAX OFFICER [TDS] WARD 57[2] KOLKATA


For Appellant      :      Ms. Sutapa Roychowdhury, Advocate


BEFORE:

The Hon'ble JUSTICE BHATTACHARYA

The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAGHUNATH BHATTACHARYYA

Date : 6th May, 2011.



                 This appeal will be heard on the following substantial questions

  of law:

                 "(I)     Whether    the   learned   Tribunal   below   committed

  substantial error of law in not deciding the question raised by the authority

  as to whether the Assessing Officer was competent to initiate proceeding

  under Section 201(1)/ 201(1A) of the Income Tax in the year 2008 for the

  assessment year 2002-03.

                 (II)     Whether    the   learned   Tribunal   below   committed

  substantial error of law in not deciding the question whether Section 194A of

  the Act is applicable as no interest was paid to M/s. Globe International."
                     Let notice of this appeal be served by the department on the

     respondent on usual course.

Let requisite number of informal paper book containing all relevant papers used before the authority below be filed within two months from date. In default, the appeal will stand dismissed.

Re: Stay Application Learned advocate for the petitioner is directed to serve a copy of the application for stay upon the Revenue informing that the matter will appear one week after reopening after summer vacation.

There will be an order of stay of operation of all further proceedings, consequent to the order of Tribunal below, till fortnight after reopening after summer vacation with liberty to mention after service of copy of the application for inclusion.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(BHATTACHARYA, J.) (RAGHUNATH BHATTACHARYYA, J.) sm AR[CR]