Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Mohammed Badruddin Ajmal vs Kamalakhya Dey Purkayastha And 2 Ors on 1 August, 2025

                                                                          Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010021472025




                                                                   undefined

                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : Crl.Pet./100/2025

            MOHAMMED BADRUDDIN AJMAL
            S/O LATE AJMAL ALI HAJI ABDUL MAJID, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE
            DONKIGAON, PO AND PS HOJAI, DIST HOJAI, ASSAM 782435



            VERSUS

            KAMALAKHYA DEY PURKAYASTHA AND 2 ORS.
            S/O LATE KAUSHIK RANJAN DEY PURKAYASTHA RESIDENTOF SUBHASH
            NAGAR, SRIBHUMI (KARIMGANJ) TOWN, PO AND PS SRIBHUMI
            (KARIMGANJ) , DIST SRIBHUMI (KARIMGANJ) , ASSAM 788710

            2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
             REPRESENTED BY PP
            ASSAM

            3:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE
             KARIMGANJ POLICE STATION PO AND PS SRIBHUMI (KARIMGANJ)
             DIST SRIBHUMI (KARIMGANJ)
            ASSAM
             PIN78871

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. M K HUSSAIN, MR. M ALOM,MS. F H AHMED,MRS. S Y
AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MD. A H LASKAR (R-1),MRS. S GOSWAMI (R-
1),MR. R GUPTA (R-1)
                                                                              Page No.# 2/3

                             BEFORE
                 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS

                                       ORDER

01.08.2025

1. Heard Mr. M.K. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. S. Goswami, learned counsel for the respondent no.1/private respondent.

2. Mr. M.K. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they are aggrieved by the criminal proceeding regarding defamation initiated at the instance of the informant/respondent 1 through a police investigation; further submitting that the same is not permissible as per the settled law.

3. Ms. S. Goswami, learned counsel for the respondent no.1/private respondent submits that they have received the copies, but that some pages i.e. page nos. 8 and 9 are not available and seeks complete set of the documents.

4. The prayer is allowed.

5. The petitioner's side has furnished the same, which is accepted by the learned counsel for the respondent no.1/private respondent.

6. Perused the copy of the police report and the complaint/ejahar before Karimganj Police Station resulting in registration of Karimganj PS Non FIR Part-III Case No.2/2022.

7. Prima-facie, I am of the considered opinion that perhaps till Page No.# 3/3 the next date, the further proceedings in CR Case No.1007/2022, pending before the learned Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sribhumi(Karimganj) shall remain stayed.

8. List the matter again in the first week of September, 2025.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant