Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Arjun Tukaram Ingle vs Vice-Chairman/Joint Commissioner, ... on 27 September, 2018

Author: B. R. Gavai

Bench: B. R. Gavai, Rohit B. Deo

                                                                   wp3489.18


                                        1




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
                         Writ Petition No.3489 of 2018


 Arjun Tukaram Ingle,
 aged 47 years,
 occupation - service,
 resident of Dongershevali,
 Tq. Chikhali,
 Distt. Buldana.                                  .....            Petitioner


                                      Versus


 1.     Vice-Chairman/Joint Commissioner,
        Scheduled Tribe Caste
        Certificate Scrutiny Committee,
        Irwin Chowk, Amravati Division,
        Amravati.

 2.     Director of Municipal
        Administration,
        Dma Office, Sarpochkhanwala
        Marg, Worli, Mumbai.

 3.     Collector, Buldana.

 4.     Municipal Council, I
        Chikhli,
        through its Chief Officer,
        Tq. Chikhli,
        Distt. Buldana.                         ....          Respondents



                                       *****


::: Uploaded on - 01/10/2018                   ::: Downloaded on - 02/10/2018 00:31:00 :::
                                                                     wp3489.18


                                        2



 Mr. A. P. Kalmegh, Adv., for the petitioner.

 Ms. Barabde, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3.

 Mr. S. A. Chaudhari, Adv., for respondent no.4.

                                     *****


                                 CORAM :        B. R. GAVAI AND
                                                ROHIT B. DEO, JJ.

                                 Date       :   27th September, 2018



 ORAL JUDGMENT [Per B. R. Gavai, J.]:

01. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned counsel for the parties.

02. The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent no.1 - Caste Scrutiny Committee, thereby invalidating the claim of petitioner of belonging to "Thakur" - Scheduled Tribe. The claim of the petitioner deserves to be allowed on the short ground. The real brother of the petitioner, namely Gajanan, has already been granted Validity by the Scrutiny Committee. Apart from that, various other family members of the petitioner have also been granted Validity. In that view of the matter and in view of the law laid down by this Court in the case of Apoorva Vinay Nichale Vs. ::: Uploaded on - 01/10/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 02/10/2018 00:31:00 ::: wp3489.18 3 Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee No.1 & others [[2010 (6) Mh. L.J. 401], the Writ Petition deserves to be allowed.

03. Rule is, therefore, made absolute by quashing and setting aside the impugned order. It is held that the petitioner belongs to "Thakur" - Scheduled Tribe. Accordingly, the Validity Certificate be issued in favour of the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today.

           Judge                                                Judge
                               -0-0-0-0-




 |हेडाऊ|




::: Uploaded on - 01/10/2018                   ::: Downloaded on - 02/10/2018 00:31:00 :::