Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Mousumi Naskar vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 18 May, 2016

Author: Tapabrata Chakraborty

Bench: Tapabrata Chakraborty

                                           1




                               W. P. No.9131 (W) of 2016
                                    Mousumi Naskar
                                           v.
                             The State of West Bengal & Ors.

18.05.16   Mr. Bidyut Kr. Halder                         ... for the petitioner.
Sl-36
(S.R.)     Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya
           Mr. Saugata Roy                               ... for the council.


                  Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner be kept on record.

                  The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that

           reliefs have been prayed for in the writ application placing reliance

           upon a judgment dated 26th February, 2010 passed in W. P. 23077 (W)

           of 2009 and a judgment dated 12th April, 2011 passed in appeals

           preferred against the orders of disposal of the writ applications in terms

           of the judgment and order dated 29th June, 2010 passed in W.P.

           No.2580 (W) of 2010 (Tumpa Roy -vs- State of West Bengal and

           others).

                  It has been pointed out that I appeared on behalf of the State

           respondents in the writ application, being W. P. 23077 (W) of 2009

(Hiranmoy Bhowmik and others -vs- The State of West Bengal and others) and in the appeals disposed of by the judgment dated 12th April, 2011 and also in the writ application, being W. P. 2580 (W) of 2010 (Tumpa Roy -vs- State of West Bengal and others).

In view of such facts, this Court is not inclined to hear this writ 2 application and the same is, accordingly, released from my list.

The petitioner would be at liberty to take necessary steps for assignment of the matter before the appropriate Hon'ble Court.

(Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)