Karnataka High Court
Archana Mahila Consumer Co Operative ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 August, 2017
Author: A.S.Bopanna
Bench: A S Bopanna
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2017
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A S BOPANNA
WRIT PETITION Nos.37397-37401/2017 (GM-PDS)
BETWEEN:
1. ARCHANA MAHILA CONSUMER
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
SMT. AMMULU
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
SHOP NO.554, DIVISION 30
SRINAGARA, SOUTH RANGE
BANGALORE-560050
BLS NO.40
2. ARCHANA MAHILA CONSUMER
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
SMT. AMMULU
AGED ABOUT 28 Y EARS
NO.970-14, 10TH MAIN ROAD
RAGHAVENDRABADAVANE
SRINAGARA
BANGALORE-560050
BLS NO.41
3. NANDINI BALAKEDARARA
SAHAKARA SANGHA
SHOP NO.124
GOWDARAPALYA
GANESHA TEMPLE
BANGALORE-560070
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
SMT. MAHESHWARI
BLS NO.124
4. NANDINI BALAKEDARARA SAHAKARA SANGHA
SHOP NO.27
NO.12/A, 4TH CROSS
2
7TH MAIN, SB COLONY
BSK 3RD STAGE
BANGALORE-560085
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
SMT. MAHESHWARI
BLS NO.27
5. MUNIRAJU STORES
REP. BY ITS PROP.
MUNIRAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
NO.24/1, 2ND CROSS
MISSION ROAD
BANGALORE-560027
BLS NO.084
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI NAGARAJA N NAIDU, ADV.)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF FOOD CIVIL
SUPPLIES & CONSUMER AFFAIRS
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
VIKASA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560001
2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR FOOD &
CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT
CUNNINGHAM ROAD
BANGALORE-560054
3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR
FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT
CUNNINGHAM ROAD
BANGALORE-560054
4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR
SOTUH RANGE
N R COLONY
BANGALORE-560075
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI A C BALRAJ, HCGP)
3
THESE PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, WITH A PRAYER TO CALL
FOR RECORDS FROM THE OFFICE OF THE RESPONDENTS AND
QUASH THE ORDER DATED 27.7.2017 PASSED BY THE R-2 AT
ANNEX-H AND ALSO ORDER DATED 28.2.2017 PASSED BY THE
R-3 AT ANNEX-F TO F4.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned Government Advocate to accept notice for respondents and file memo of appearance in four weeks.
2. The petitioners are before this Court claiming to be aggrieved by the orders impugned whereby, the application filed by the petitioners seeking grant of stay has been rejected by respondent No.2.
3. Though, several contentions are urged in these petitions, the same need not be adverted to in detail since, this Court in similar circumstance has considered this aspect of the matter. In particular, this Court, while disposing of W.P.No.36191-36213/2017 on 16.08.2017 has taken note of these aspects and has ordered that the interim order of stay shall enure to the 4 benefit of the petitioners, till the appeal pending before the respondent No.2 is considered and disposed of.
3. In that view, in the instant petitions also, the orders impugned are set aside. The benefit of the interim order shall enure to the petitioners, till the appeals which are the subject matters of these petitions are considered and disposed of on merits by respondent No.2 In terms of the above, the writ petitions stand disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE akc/bms